Bin Laden, two others didn't fire on SEALs: sources

WASHINGTON Thu May 5, 2011 7:10pm EDT

Members of the anti-terrorism squad are seen surrounding the compound where al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was killed in Abbottabad May 4, 2011. REUTERS/Faisal Mahmood

Members of the anti-terrorism squad are seen surrounding the compound where al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was killed in Abbottabad May 4, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Faisal Mahmood

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Only one of four principal targets shot dead by U.S. commandos in the raid which killed Osama bin Laden was involved in any hostile fire, a person familiar with the latest U.S. government reporting on the raid told Reuters on Thursday.

The account of Monday's daring 40-minute raid has new descriptions of the event, including that Navy SEALs shot an occupant of the compound who they thought was armed, but apparently was not.

It confirms that bin Laden was not armed when he was shot dead, nor are there indications that he directly threatened his attackers, according to the first source and a second U.S. government source who is familiar with briefings on the raid.

They requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak for the record.

The Obama administration had given numerous, conflicting accounts of the raid this week, and it is possible these accounts will be revised yet again.

Here is a chronological version of what is now said to have happened on Monday when the SEAL team raided bin Laden's hide-out in Abbotabad, Pakistan:

A SEAL squad moved in darkness on the guest house, one of two dwellings inside the walls of bin Laden's compound. They were met with hostile fire. As they moved in, they shot a man who was in the guest house.

He turned out to be Abu Ahmed Al-Kuwaiti, the al Qaeda courier whose activities the CIA and other U.S. intelligence agencies had been investigating for years and who they believed would lead them to bin Laden.

After shooting al-Kuwaiti, the two sources familiar with official accounts said, U.S. commandos moved onto the compound's three-story main residence.

As they entered the house, they saw a man with his hands behind his back. Fearing that the man might be holding a weapon behind him, the commandos shot him dead.

It turned out that the man, who was the brother of Abu Ahmed al Kuwaiti and another suspected al Qaeda courier, was not holding a weapon, according to the two sources familiar with official accounts.

However, the attackers did subsequently find weapons near the second man's body, the sources said.

After killing the second courier, commandos started climbing the stairs to the house's upper floors. As they climbed, a man charged down the stairs at them, and was shot dead. U.S. authorities now believe that he was Osama bin Laden's son.

As commandos proceeded up the stairs, the sources said, they saw a person they believed was bin Laden either poke his head out of a door or over a balcony. One of the sources said that the attackers took at least one shot at the person, who then retreated back inside the room he had come from.

The U.S. commandos proceeded to the top floor and into the room where the man had retreated. While entering the room, they were rushed by a woman. The woman, now believed to be one of bin Laden's wives, was shot in the leg.

After shooting her, the commandos pushed her to the side. Precisely what bin Laden then did, and what his reaction was when the commandos entered and shot his wife, is unclear.

But the people familiar with official accounts said the attackers did not wait for much of a reaction, and almost immediately shot the al Qaeda leader dead.

(Editing by Warren Strobel and Vicki Allen)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (40)
UE7 wrote:
This doesn’t give the complete story.. I thought I read in another article that it was a protected compound with barbed wires and several families living in it including several kids etc.. Did they not encounter any other people along the way? I guess they knew exactly which room to go into before they went in .. so there could be a mole within the compound.

May 05, 2011 7:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
wls wrote:
Who cares? This jerk off was responsible for the death of 3,000 unarmed Americans who did not do one thing to him. I don’t care if they blindfolded and executed him. They spent almost 10 years chasing him. They need to take action when they had to opportunity and not take a chance on getting hurt or him getting away. I am glad the last thing he saw was the business end of a gun wielded by am American. The media will run this in the ground just like they do everything else.

Obama was an idiot for releasing contradictory info. I do applaud him for having the balls to do this. Personally, I doubted it.

May 05, 2011 7:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
oldhiggy wrote:
The administration can’t seem to get the story straight. One day the people are armed the next day they are not. Did they really get him?? Show me the proof. Pictures would be nice.

And we are expected to trust these idiots with our health care!!!!!

May 05, 2011 7:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus