Snap Analysis: Jobs report shows strength with a caveat

WASHINGTON Fri May 6, 2011 9:29am EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. private sector in April generated the most jobs since February 2006, but the jobless rate jumped back up to 9 percent from the previous month's 8.8 percent.

As economists try to make sense of these conflicting signals, perhaps the only certainty was that it will take another couple more months of data to figure out exactly where the U.S. economy is headed.

Total U.S. non-farm payroll employment expanded by 244,000 jobs in April according to the Labor Department's survey of employers, well above median forecasts in a Reuters poll for a gain of 186,000 and the strongest reading in 11 months.

However, the separate household survey, from which the unemployment rate is derived, painted an entirely different picture. It showed the number of employed Americans falling by 190,000 on net following a 291,000 rise in March. The number of jobless in that report, meanwhile, rose by 205,000.

The increase in the jobless rate surprised forecasters, who had been looking for a steady reading of 8.8 percent. The unemployment rate had fallen sharply in recent months, though a shrinking labor force was a factor behind the decline.

"Had the (labor force) participation remained unchanged, the unemployment rate would still have been 10.1 percent in March," Goldman Sachs economists said in a research note ahead of the April employment report.

The survey of employers, however, showed broad strength, although the pace of payroll employment has done little to whittle away at the ranks of jobless Americans.

"The number of unemployed persons, at 13.7 million, changed little in April," the Bureau of Labor Statistics said in a statement.

Here are some other interesting details that emerge from the report, which can be found here:

* U.S. retail employment posted a large gain of 57,100 jobs, though some economists were suspicious of seasonal adjustments due to a late Easter holiday.

* Construction employment remained anemic, with the sector adding just 5,000 jobs. The housing sector remains depressed and could be a further drag on growth in coming months, but it is now a smaller chunk of the overall economy, which in part mutes its negative effect.

* Surging energy and commodity costs were expected to discourage employers from taking on new workers but that appears not to have happened. The strong payrolls figure suggests business confidence remains strong despite a sharp run-up in energy costs.

* A decline in temporary help services jobs is hard to read. Generally, increases in temporary jobs are seen as a harbinger of future growth in permanent jobs.

*The breakdown showed big increases in professional and business employment -- indicating a more broad-based improvement rather than in simply low-end jobs.

(Reporting by Pedro Nicolaci da Costa, Editing by ChizuNomiyama)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (11)
Harry079 wrote:
Yea those 50,000 McJobs really turned things around.

Most of the 244,000 jobs are $10/hr or less with no benefits at all.

Don’t forget the 470,000 that just got laid off last week.

May 06, 2011 9:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
vikings4123 wrote:
Thanks to Drudge Report for reposting this Reuters article from 1 year ago: From Reuters, Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:18pm EDT —
“Vice President Joe Biden predicted on Friday the U.S. economy would create 100,000 to 200,000 jobs next month, with a rise to 250,000 to 500,000 jobs per month soon afterward, according to a press pool report.”….Yeah, right. A broken clock is right more often than Joe Biden. For that matter, add Christina Romer and the annointed one to that list. Romer slinked away back to Berkeley once she realized all of her Keynesian beliefs were not working…

May 06, 2011 10:09am EDT  --  Report as abuse
nzahn1 wrote:
“Most of the 244,000 jobs are $10/hr or less with no benefits at all.”

Apparently you never read to the end of the article:
“The breakdown showed big increases in professional and business employment — indicating a more broad-based improvement rather than in simply low-end jobs.”

May 06, 2011 10:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.