Sen. Schumer proposes "no-ride list" for Amtrak trains

NEW YORK Sun May 8, 2011 3:56pm EDT

An Amtrak train attendant looks over paperwork on the 5 California Zephyr train in Chicago June 12, 2008. REUTERS/Joshua Lott

An Amtrak train attendant looks over paperwork on the 5 California Zephyr train in Chicago June 12, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Lott

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A senator on Sunday called for a "no-ride list" for Amtrak trains after intelligence gleaned from the raid on Osama bin Laden's compound pointed to potential attacks on the nation's train system.

Sen. Charles Schumer said he would push as well for added funding for rail security and commuter and passenger train track inspections and more monitoring of stations nationwide.

"Circumstances demand we make adjustments by increasing funding to enhance rail safety and monitoring on commuter rail transit and screening who gets on Amtrak passenger trains, so that we can provide a greater level of security to the public," the New York Democrat said at a news conference.

U.S. officials last week said evidence found after the raid on bin Laden's compound in Pakistan indicated the al Qaeda leader or his associates had engaged in discussions or planning for a possible attack on a train inside the United States on September 11, 2011.

Schumer, citing U.S. intelligence analysts, said attacks were also considered on Christmas and New Year's Day and following the president's State of the Union address.

He called on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to expand the Secure Flight monitoring program, which cross-checks air travelers with the terror watch list in an attempt to prevent anyone on the "no-fly list" from boarding, for use on Amtrak.

Such a procedure would create an Amtrak "no-ride list" to keep suspected terrorists off the U.S. rail system, he said.

The September 11 Commission recommended in 2004 that the government check travelers' names against terror watch lists before they board passenger trains or cruise ships, but such a program was not adopted.

Schumer noted that rail and port security grant funding was cut by $50 million under last month's federal budget compromise, but he said developments warrant reconsideration and increased rail safety funding.

(Reporting by Chris Michaud, editing by Ellen Wulfhorst)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (45)
ArghONaught wrote:
With such practical ideas everyone will need a permit to leave their homes, or be shot on sight. Next – no drive, no ride buses, metal detectors in supermarkets and malls. Who who will in jail suffering from terrorism? Every American!

May 08, 2011 4:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
OCTheo wrote:
Schumer is a MORON! These idiots we elect to serve us are so ignorant that all they want to do is scare us, so they can stay in power.

We are no longer scared. People should just say no to these idiots, and vote them out of the office. More people die each year from contaminated food than terrorism, and yet the government does nothing. Infact they protect the food industry. More people die from wrong medication than terrorism. More people die from handguns, but we still sell guns to anyone with cash.

The greatest terrorists are now the US government. They terrorize other nations by invading, attacking and killing both foreigners and American service men and women. They terrorize Americans by depriving us of resources we need to survive.

Washington bureaucrats, STOP SCARING US! Schumer and his whole family should be the first persons on the list of “no-ride list”.

May 08, 2011 4:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SanCo wrote:
Where does it end Schumer?

Will you be checking us as we go into the market, or the bathroom at the ball stadium?

Life is unsafe, we all have to take our chances.

May 08, 2011 4:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.