Public Citizen: Key data left out of Alzheimer's study

Related Topics

CHICAGO | Tue May 10, 2011 7:39pm EDT

CHICAGO (Reuters) - A U.S. consumer group alleged on Tuesday that researchers with ties to Eli Lilly and Co withheld important information from a medical journal in their study of an imaging drug for Alzheimer's disease.

In a letter published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Public Citizen criticized a January 19 study that assessed the effectiveness of brain scans using Lilly's Amyvid, an experimental dye to detect brain abnormalities.

They said the study authors excluded data on how accurately the scans were interpreted from one physician to the next.

"By withholding important information, the authors misled the journal and its readers to believe that this test for identifying brain abnormalities was more reliable than it actually is," Dr. Michael Carome, deputy director of Public Citizen's Health Research Group, wrote.

"Given what is known about Alzheimer's disease and the lack of effective treatments, any proposed test for diagnosing this disease must be proven to be highly accurate in large, rigorously conducted studies before it is approved by the FDA for marketing," Carome said.

Lilly strongly disputes their claims, calling them "inaccurate."

"We worked with the FDA to identify and specify all endpoints for the Amyvid Phase III study," the company said in a statement.

Lilly said all of the endpoints in the study were met, and they were "disclosed appropriately.

In March, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration declined to approve Amyvid, citing the need to ensure the scans can be accurately read.

An FDA advisory panel had said in January that more data would be required before approval.

Amyvid aims to detect the beta-amyloid plaque associated with Alzheimer's disease in the brains of living people using an imaging procedure called a positron emission tomography (PET) scan.

An unreliable test could lead some people to believe they had Alzheimer's when they did not, and it could give others the false assurance that the did not have the disease, when they might, Public Citizen said in an email.

Lilly is seeking to market the agent for use with PET scans to help doctors rule out the plaque linked with Alzheimer's, but not to diagnose the disease.

General Electric and Bayer AG are also developing rival products.

Lilly and its unit Avid Radiopharmaceuticals have said they are working to address the questions raised by the FDA advisory panel and will continue to do so in an ongoing dialogue.

Currently, some 26 million people globally have Alzheimer's disease, the most common form of dementia.

(Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen; Editing by Laura MacInnis and Paul Simao)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
DanielHaz wrote:
Eli Lilly’s #1 cash cow Zyprexa drug sale $40 billion dollars so far,has a ten times greater risk of causing type 2 diabetes over the non-user of Zyprexa. So,here we have a conflict of interest that this same company also is a big profiteer of diabetes treatment.

FIVE at FIVE
The Zyprexa antipsychotic drug,whose side effects can include weight gain and diabetes, was sold for “children in foster care, people who have trouble sleeping, elderly in nursing homes.”
Five at Five was the Zyprexa sales rep slogan, meaning 5mg dispensed at 5pm would keep patients quiet.
Google * Eli Lilly Zyprexa * and read the links. I took Zyprexa it gave me diabetes and was as addictive as tobacco.How so? Because withdrawal is accompanied by severe insomnia for 6 weeks.
– Daniel Haszard

May 10, 2011 12:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
CITADEL4U wrote:
Scientist that take money to promote inaccurate data??????

Naw, Scientists are the most honest people in the world: HA HA HA……

Can you say: “GLOBAL WARMING,” “CARBON TAX CREDITS,” OR “MASSIVE RESEARCH FUNDING for BOGUS SCIENCE.”

I thought you could!!!

NEVER TRUST ANYONE WHO HAS A MONETARY STAKE IN THE OUTCOME OF THEIR RESEARCH: EVER!

May 11, 2011 9:06am EDT  --  Report as abuse
5tudentT wrote:
Lilly is engaging in a common business practice. It is normal and accepted for a firm to exaggerate its claims (puffery) and to be selective about the data they present, as long as they don’t outright lie. That’s why, for example, multiple cell phone companies can claim to have the best coverage.

I think this is stupid, but bizmen have managed to convince us that this, like anything else they take it into their heads to do, is really best for everyone.

At least in the case of drug manufacturers they should not be allowed to do these things. They aren’t making cars or televisions.

CITADEL4U – You can make your own foil hat out of common household products. No need to keep buying them.

May 11, 2011 10:48am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.