Amazon could cut ties in more states over tax dispute

NEW YORK Wed May 11, 2011 5:13pm EDT

Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon.com Inc., holds an interview with Reuters next to a Kindle in Cupertino, California, October 6, 2009. REUTERS/Kim White

Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon.com Inc., holds an interview with Reuters next to a Kindle in Cupertino, California, October 6, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Kim White

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Amazon.com could cut its partnership with affiliates in more U.S. states that require the online retailer to collect sales tax, Chief Executive Jeff Bezos said on Wednesday.

The comments from the world's largest online retailer come less than a month after brick-and-mortar rival Best Buy expressed optimism about potential online taxation reforms that would expand the collection of sales taxes on items bought over the Internet.

Many traditional chains such as Best Buy and Sears have openly voiced their concerns about online-only retailers like Amazon getting an unfair advantage by not having to collect sales tax in states where it does not have a corporate presence.

Lawmakers in states -- many facing huge budget deficits -- have also argued that Amazon has a duty to collect tax because its "affiliates," or independent Web operators which are paid a fee when they drive traffic to Amazon that results in a sale, operate in the state.

Amazon has already announced plans to cancel its affiliate program in Illinois in response to the state's new law to target online retailers that have affiliates in the state.

Texas is considering taxing online sales and California, which already passed legislation that was vetoed, is considering another bill. Last October, Amazon also got a $269 million bill for uncollected sales taxes from the state of Texas.

"We will continue to drop states who pass those affiliate laws, from the affiliate program," Bezos said at the ShopSmart Shopping Summit in New York on Wednesday.

"In the U.S., the constitution prohibits states from interfering in interstate commerce," Bezos said, citing a U.S. Supreme Court case decades ago that clarified that "mail order" companies could not be required to collect sales tax in states where they did not have "nexus."

Bezos said the issue highlighted the need to simplify the existing sales tax system.

"The sales tax collection is very complicated," Bezos said. "The right place to fix this is with federal legislation."

(Reporting by Dhanya Skariachan; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
AdamSmith wrote:
These proposed sales taxes, like all sales taxes, are regressive in nature. They take a far more burdensome bite out of the annual incomes of poor and middle class consumers than of the wealthy, who hardly feel them.

Sales taxes on online transaction would make the American economy less efficient AND less fair.

May 12, 2011 2:23am EDT  --  Report as abuse
i do not like sears and best buy… their issue is not fairness in taxes… their issue is their dying business models… if amazon pays sales tax… sears and best buy needs to stop getting any special tax treatments…

May 12, 2011 8:45am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Fishrl wrote:
Like this is going to be fixed at the Federal level!

Brick and mortar stores can compete with Amazon. They don’t want to make the changes they need to do it and they expect the government to help them. Isn’t that a little like socialism? Is it OK if businesses benefit from government largess, but not individuals? And what is going to happen to eBay and Craigslist? How about flea markets and garage sales?

May 12, 2011 9:25am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.