Read
- Exclusive: Fidelity facing "thousands" hit by Facebook woes
- Facebook market makers' losses total at least $100 million
|
- Protests planned after minister calls for gays to be fenced in
- Exclusive: China leadership rules Bo case isolated, limits purge: sources
- What would Greek exit mean for the U.S. economy?
Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
Choosing C-section may not prevent incontinence
NEW YORK |
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Having a Cesarean section may not lower a woman's chance of incontinence later in life -- unless she delivers all of her children that way, according to a new study.
The findings question the suggestion that by choosing a c-section over vaginal delivery, women might be protecting themselves against urinary or fecal incontinence down the road.
And they "comprise an important new message to inform the choice of delivery by caesarean section," the authors wrote in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Recent evidence shows that the rate of C-sections performed in the U.S. has been rising, from one in five births in 1996 to almost one in three births in 2007, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Many doctors see this trend as risky because C-sections have been linked to a higher chance of breathing problems in babies and future pregnancy complications in moms.
In the current study, Dr. Cathryn Glazener of the University of Aberdeen in the UK and her colleagues tracked almost 4,000 women who gave birth in the UK and New Zealand for 12 years after their delivery.
After recording how those first babies were delivered, the researchers kept in touch with women through questionnaires to find out if they had more children, and whether those children were born through c-sections or vaginal deliveries.
They also followed up with the participants to ask if they had symptoms of urinary or fecal incontinence, and if so, how often.
At the end of the 12 years, just over half of women reported urinary incontinence, and a quarter had symptoms at least once a week.
In women who had given birth only through vaginal delivery, 55 percent reported experiencing urinary incontinence. That compared to 59 percent of women who had at least one baby through vaginal delivery and one via C-section. In women who only had C-sections, the rate of urinary incontinence fell to 40 percent.
Rates of fecal incontinence 12 years down the line were about the same -- between 11 and 14 percent -- in women who had only given birth through vaginal deliveries or C-sections alone, or had given birth through both modes of delivery.
Regardless of how they delivered their children, women who were heavier, had given birth more times, and were older at their first delivery reported higher rates of incontinence.
Glazener told Reuters Health that vaginal delivery has been thought to cause urinary incontinence through physical trauma and damage to nerves.
She and her colleagues concluded that, "Unless women are resolved to have all their deliveries by the abdominal (c-section) route (and their medical advisors agree), cesarean section does not protect from subsequent" urinary incontinence.
SOURCE: bit.ly/jiMgXX BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, online April 8, 2011
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
“Having a Cesarean section may not lower a woman’s chance of incontinence later in life — unless she delivers all of her children that way.”
I chose a cesarean birth with both of my children, and the potential protection of my pelvic floor was certainly a factor in making my informed decision. So many birth advocates persistently downplay the risk of pelvic floor damage (including incontinence but also pelvic organ prolapse) when informing women about the risks of planning a vaginal birth, and yet this study adds to an existing body of evidence – highlighting an increased risk.
It is very interesting to me that this undeniably ‘good cesarean news’ should be presented here in the style of a back-handed compliment, and I would suggest this as an alternative headline:
“Giving birth exclusively by cesarean may lower a woman’s chance of incontinence later in life”.
Finally – it would be useful to report on the difference in this study (if the information is available) between women whose cesareans were planned and those who had emergency surgery, as this is likely to make a difference in health outcomes too.



Follow Reuters