Texas House passes bill banning TSA airport "groping"

Passengers wait in line to pass through the security check point at DFW Airport in Fort Worth,Texas November 15, 2007. REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi

Passengers wait in line to pass through the security check point at DFW Airport in Fort Worth,Texas November 15, 2007.

Credit: Reuters/Jessica Rinaldi

Related Topics

AUSTIN, Tex | Fri May 13, 2011 2:59pm EDT

AUSTIN, Tex (Reuters) - The Texas House of Representatives late on Thursday approved a bill that would make invasive pat-downs at Texas airports a crime, after a former Miss USA said she felt "molested" at the Dallas/Fort Worth airport last month.

Transportation Security Administration agents could be charged with a misdemeanor crime, face a $4,000 fine and one year in jail under the measure.

The proposal would classify any airport inspection that "touches the anus, sexual organ, buttocks, or breast of another person including through the clothing, or touches the other person in a manner that would be offensive to a reasonable person" as an offense of sexual harassment under official oppression.

The measure's author, Republican David Simpson, said: "Indecent groping searches when innocent travelers are seeking access to airports and public buildings would be outlawed under this bill."

The bill needs a final vote from the House before it would go to the Senate.

"This has to do with dignity in travel," Simpson said.

TSA spokesman Luis Casanova said he could not comment on pending legislation. He said just 3 percent of the traveling public is subjected to pat-downs.

TSA pat-downs have drawn some high-profile criticism, including from former Miss USA Susie Castillo, who said in a widely-viewed online video. that she felt "molested" by a pat-down at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport last month.

The agency reviewed Castillo's incident and found that the officer followed proper procedures, said TSA assistant administrator Kristine Lee.

"We wish we lived in a world where security procedures at airports weren't necessary but that just isn't the case," Lee said in a statement.

(Reporting by Jim Forsyth and Corrie MacLaggan; Editing by Greg McCune)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Hallelujah!

May 13, 2011 2:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
nosmtrthanu wrote:
we want airports to be the most secure places on earth as long as SOMEBODY ELSE gets searched. miss america’s video should be renamed miss whiney crybaby. that was nothing compared to what could happen without searches. somebody is going to have to die again before the whiners wake up. if half the flights were announced as “no search” flights, most of the whiners would still choose the flights where only people who were searched could fly.

May 13, 2011 3:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Scanpruf wrote:
40,000 deaths per year on the highways.
ZERO deaths in airliners in the last 10 years.
Terrific risk mitigation.

Road (Air) Rage is mounting.
Kill the TSA before passengers start killing them!

May 13, 2011 4:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.