Palestinians turn back clock in Israel struggle

RAMALLAH, West Bank Sun May 15, 2011 2:55pm EDT

Related Topics

RAMALLAH, West Bank (Reuters) - The Palestinians who forced their way across Israel's border on Sunday turned back the clock on the Middle East conflict, putting center stage the refugee question that many believed would be negotiated away.

Protests at Israel's borders with Syria and Lebanon also cast the spotlight on a diaspora marginalized in Palestinian politics since Yasser Arafat moved from exile to the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip two decades ago.

It was not without cost -- at least 13 demonstrators were shot dead. Organized by members of a refugee community claiming a right to return to their old homes in modern-day Israel, the protests generated pride and delight in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, home to some 2 million members of that diaspora.

When some protesters breached the frontier with Syria, in scenes broadcast live on satellite TV, to Palestinians it seemed the impossible had happened, even if only for a brief while.

"This is a message to anyone who thinks of giving up the right of return," said Abdel Qader al-Beshawi, a 50-year old Palestinian from Balata refugee camp in the West Bank, captured along with Gaza in the 1967 Middle East war.

His family were forced from their home in the seaside town of Jaffa in the 1948 war that helped set the borders of the state of Israel and sparked the departure of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees to surrounding Arab lands.

"For the first time I felt that that we could return to our town after years of deep despair," said Beshawi, one of some 4.8 million Palestinian refugees registered with the U.N. in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and the occupied Palestinian territory.

"INALIENABLE RIGHT"

Like the fate of Jerusalem, the refugee question is one of the issues at the heart of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

But the refugees have long suspected that their longed-for return was being negotiated away in the Middle East peace process aimed at the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

To Israel, the idea of a mass return of refugees is a non-starter that would destroy the Jewish state.

Israel says any solution to the refugee question should be found within the borders of a future Palestine and described Sunday's clashes as cynical provocation inspired by its foe Iran.

Syria, an ally of Iran, has always kept tight control of its border with Israel and, even with current internal unrest faced by the Damascus government, observers said it was hard to imagine Sunday's protest happening without official approval.

To the Palestinians, the protests cut to the very core of their struggle, falling on the day they call the "Nakba," or catastrophe, which marks the creation of Israel 63 years ago.

The right of return has been the main theme of posters put up all over Ramallah to mark this year's Nakba anniversary.

Details of peace talks between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) have spoken of the return of a token number of refugees to Israel and a solution agreed upon by both sides. To refugees, such ideas amount to a sell-out.

Hamas, which governs in Gaza, is not part of the PLO and has always rejected the idea of a negotiated peace deal with Israel.

"The crowds we have seen in Palestine, Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon is an evidence of the imminent victory and return to the original homes as promised by God," said Taher Al-Nono, spokesman of the Hamas government in Gaza.

Leading members of the Palestine Liberation Organization said Sunday's protests gave new life to the demand for the right of return to homes lost when Israel was created.

"The right of return is a fixed, inalienable right and the Palestinians revived it this time on the Nakba anniversary in its own special way, inspired by what happened in the Arab states," said Tayser Khaled, a member of the PLO executive.

(Additional reporting by Nidal al-Mughrabi in Gaza; Editing by Matthew Jones)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
This Article mentions the Agency began working with around 750,000 in 1950.

If it were unbiased and showed the entire story, it would mention that following the 1948 war, there were also almost 800,000 Jewish refugees who “fled or were forced out of their homes” in Arab countries across the Middle East.

So why, then, is there no Jewish refugee problem today, but there is still a Palestinian refugee problem?

Because Israel took in and resettled all the Jewish refugees, providing them with citizenship, housing, and other basic needs. Today they are like any other Israeli citizen.

In contrast, the countries mentioned in this article (Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria) did NOT provide anything for the Palestinian refugees, but instead left them in refugee camps where they still live today.

While the Palestinian refugee problem stems from the 1948 conflict, it could have been solved over 60 years ago had Israel’s neighbors shown them any decency. Instead, they have kept the issue alive all this time, ruining the lives of many thousands of Palestinians, and unfairly tainting Israel’s reputation internationally.

May 15, 2011 12:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
FACTBOX?!
There are some very questionable “Facts” here.
IF UNRWA defines Palestinian refugees as “people whose normal place of residence was Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948, who lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict.”, they started out serving 750,000 and now there are millions?! The descendants of refugees are not legally considered refugees, except the Palestinians! Seems more like a disputed fact(?) to me.
Or how about UNRWA mandate in the first place? Why it the only UN agency exclusively dedicated to a particular refuge group? All other refugees in the world(!) are handled by the ‘other’ agency, UNHCR. That’s the UN though…
Or how about General Assembly Resolution 194. This is also presented as some internationally legally binding “Fact”, but it is a well known (actual) fact that the UN is notoriously anti-Israel, equating only one people’s national movement (Zionism) to racism! Sponsoring more condemnations that the entire world combined, several times over.
Honestly the whole idea of a “Palestinian Refugee” or “Occupied Territory” are misnomers because there has never been a country of Palestine. Certainly they are disputed. Before 1967, The West Bank and Gaza were annexed territories of Jordan and Egypt respectively. But no one considered them “Occupied” then, why?! The Arabs rejected the original 1948 partition of what was then known as Palestine into Arab and Jewish countries. Before that, ALL of the land had been allocated for the creation of “Jewish Homeland” in the Balfour Declaration! Before ’48 it was under British rule. Before WWI, it had been a part of the Ottoman empire for the last 400+ years before that. So if there was never a country of Palestine, there can be no refugees. Oh, and by the way, there is even no record of the “Palestinians” ever calling themselves “Palestinians” before the formation of the famous terrorist organization, the PLO.
People are welcome to their own opinions, but they are not welcome to their own “Facts”!

May 15, 2011 3:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures