U.S. weather extremes show "new normal" climate

WASHINGTON Wed May 18, 2011 5:14pm EDT

A child's doll sits among the ruins of homes badly damaged in April 27's deadly tornados in Tuscaloosa, Alabama May 2, 2011. REUTERS/Lee Celano

A child's doll sits among the ruins of homes badly damaged in April 27's deadly tornados in Tuscaloosa, Alabama May 2, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Lee Celano

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Heavy rains, deep snowfalls, monster floods and killing droughts are signs of a "new normal" of extreme U.S. weather events fueled by climate change, scientists and government planners said on Wednesday.

"It's a new normal and I really do think that global weirding is the best way to describe what we're seeing," climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe of Texas Tech University told reporters.

"We are used to certain conditions and there's a lot going on these days that is not what we're used to, that is outside our current frame of reference," Hayhoe said on a conference call with other experts, organized by the non-profit Union of Concerned Scientists.

An upsurge in heavy rainstorms in the United States has coincided with prolonged drought, sometimes in the same location, she said, noting that west Texas has seen a record-length dry period over the last five years, even as there have been two 100-year rain events.

Hayhoe, other scientists, civic planners and a manager at the giant Swiss Re reinsurance firm all cited human-caused climate change as an factor pushing this shift toward more extreme weather.

While none would blame climate change for any specific weather event, Hayhoe said a background of climate change had an impact on every rainstorm, heat wave or cold snap.

"What we're seeing is the new normal is constantly evolving," said Nikhil da Victoria Lobo of Swiss Re's Global Partnerships team. "Globally what we're seeing is more volatility ... there's certainly a lot more integrated risk exposure."


In addition to more extreme local weather events, he said, changes in demographics and how materials are supplied make them more vulnerable.

"In a more integrated economic system, a single shock to an isolated area can actually end up having broad-based and material implications," da Victoria Lobo said. For example, if a local storm knocks out transport and communications systems, "someone 1,000 miles away is not receiving their iPad or their car."

Aaron Durnbaugh, deputy commissioner for natural resources and water quality for Chicago, said adapting to climate change is a daunting task.

Citing the down-to-earth example of Chicago's 4,400 miles of sewer mains, which were installed over the last 150 years and will take decades to replace, Durnbaugh said accurate forecasting of future storms and floods is essential.

The city of Chicago's cost of dealing with extreme weather events through the end of this century has been conservatively estimated in a range from $690 million to $2.5 billion, Durnbaugh said, with the cost to homeowners and local businesses expected to be far higher.

Globally, da Victoria Lobo said the annual average economic losses from natural disasters have escalated from $25 billion in the 1980s to $130 billion in the first decade of the 21st century.

(Editing by Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Eideard wrote:
The average American voter will have to see the earth crumble beneath his feet, home wash down the river, lightning destroy his workplace – before he moves beyond the usual ignoranus acceptance of “God’s Will”.

Perish the thought that a bit of science and understanding creeps into the consciousness of someone who thinks Fox offers news and network television anything more than cheap circuses.

Nero figured it out. Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats continue the tradition. Hedge funds and investment banks profit from it.

May 18, 2011 5:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
nairck wrote:
The 22.5deg angle of rotational axis with geometrical axis is meant for climate change only.Also the layer by layer density variation of air is also determining nature/status of climatic condition.Human activity of sedimenting CO2 at very high rate has changed soil temperature.It has escalated .It is the prime cause for heavy evaporation rate, leading to downpour.It has helped the air to contain more heat than in the previous decades.Relay on solar heat for more areas of clean energy demand.

May 20, 2011 10:09am EDT  --  Report as abuse
iflydaplanes wrote:
Ok and what about the rest of the world? Are weather patterns shifting significantly everywhere else also? I doubt the whole climate change crap is going to localize itself over the U.S.

May 23, 2011 5:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.