Wall Street snaps losing streak, but headwinds remain

1 of 2. The Dow Jones industrial average gained 80.60 points, or 0.65 percent, to 12,560.18.

Credit: Reuters/Graphic

NEW YORK | Wed May 18, 2011 4:38pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street snapped its three-day losing streak on Wednesday thanks to a rebound in commodity prices and Dell's strong earnings, but investors say stocks still face headwinds.

Wednesday's bounce gave some respite to selling that has driven the S&P 500 down nearly 2 percent this month as soft economic data has put investors on the defensive.

"We're seeing a snap back. Is it sustainable? That is the going to be the million-dollar question," said David Lutz, managing director of trading at Stifel Nicolaus Capital Markets in Baltimore.

The stock market has slipped in tandem with sharp declines in commodities that have prompted investors to pare their riskiest bets. Some believe it points to a sustained correction, but Wednesday's action shows fund managers are keen to buy on dips.

U.S. crude oil futures rose more than 3 percent to settle back above $100 a barrel as crude inventories unexpectedly fell. Chevron Corp (CVX.N) rose 2.4 percent to $102.86, giving the Dow one of its biggest lifts.

Dell's (DELL.O) shares jumped 5.4 percent to $16.75 after the PC manufacturer reported profits late on Tuesday that exceeded expectations. The company also raised its fiscal 2012 outlook for operating income.

"The rally has been led by the raw materials, which is linked to a rebound in some of the commodity prices," said Nick Kalivas, an analyst at MF Global in Chicago. The earnings "were strong and breathed some life back into technology."

Also in the tech sector, microchip maker Analog Devices Inc ADI.N posted quarterly profit that topped market expectations, sending its shares up 5.9 percent to $42.60. The Philadelphia semiconductor index .SOX rose 1.9 percent.

Lutz said developments around Europe's debt crisis over the next few days could determine the market direction as top EU officials talk about a possible debt restructuring for Greece.

The Dow Jones industrial average .DJI gained 80.60 points, or 0.65 percent, to 12,560.18. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index .SPX rose 11.70 points, or 0.88 percent, to 1,340.68. The Nasdaq Composite Index .IXIC added 31.79 points, or 1.14 percent, to 2,815.00.

Helping transportation stocks, U.S. railroad operator CSX Corp (CSX.N) said it is targeting double-digit growth in earnings per share and operating income through 2015, expecting growth that outpaces the economy.

CSX shares rose 2.2 percent to $75.44. The Dow Jones Transportation Average.DJT gained 1.6 percent.

Most Federal Reserve officials prefer to raise benchmark interest rates before selling assets when the time comes to tighten policy, minutes of their April meeting showed on Wednesday.

Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM.N) advanced 1.7 percent to $81.74. The PHLX oil service sector index .OSX climbed 2.6 percent. The S&P energy index .GSPE added 2 percent and shared the spotlight with materials as the S&P 500's top-performing sectors.

The S&P materials index .GSPM gained 2.1 percent, buoyed by mining company Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold (FCX.N) -- up 3.8 percent at $48.62.

The Reuters/Jefferies CRB index .CRB, a broad measure of commodity performance, rose 2.3 percent. Before Wednesday's advance, the CRB index was down more than 9 percent for the month.

Staples Inc's (SPLS.O) shares tumbled 15.4 percent to $16.63 and ranked as the S&P 500's biggest percentage loser after the office supply retailer slashed its full-year outlook on weak demand and higher costs.

About 6.5 billion shares were traded on the New York Stock Exchange, NYSE Amex and Nasdaq, compared with the average of about 8.4 billion last year.

Advancing stocks outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by almost 4 to 1, and on the Nasdaq, by a ratio of about 3 to 1.

(Editing by Jan Paschal)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
finwicke wrote:
the stock market goes up and down daily,,, why is it financial columnists (fc) feel compelled to attempt to give a ‘reason’ for that days’ market move. it’s kinda like watching a tennis match on TV and the commentator, after the first point of a game, confidently states the way he things the match will go. a one day movement in the stock market, just like one point in a tennis match is hardly worth commenting on. maybe after two weeks of watching the market move, some sort of semi loogical explanation might be in order.
but to me, there seems only a handful of the same explanations used all the time to ‘explain’ market moves. they sound like talking points put out by someone – maybe goldman?
it is the macro picture, the big funds sales or purchases, large foreign goverment transactions these things move markets, but slowly.

daily stock futures are often stated to predict how the market may move. i think fc’s are entirely wrong on this. because statistically most lose on a stock futures gamble. it would probably be more accurate to bet the market will move that day in the opposite way of the futures sentiment. if most are placing puts, id guess the market would go up that day.

and on another subject – how come buying stocks are not taxed like everything else we buy? in this ‘cost cutting’ era why hasnt taxing stock purchases even discussed?
- example, on may 17 a total of $60,762,060,372 was spent on the stock market. if these was a sales tax of only .01% – that would bring in $607,620,603. or $3,038,103,018 – 3 billion $$ a week.
this tax, by the way, has been on the US communist party platform almost every election.

May 18, 2011 10:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
finwicke wrote:
the stock market goes up and down daily,,, why is it financial columnists (fc) feel compelled to attempt to give a ‘reason’ for that days’ market move. it’s kinda like watching a tennis match on TV and the commentator, after the first point of a game, confidently states the way he things the match will go. a one day movement in the stock market, just like one point in a tennis match is hardly worth commenting on. maybe after two weeks of watching the market move, some sort of semi loogical explanation might be in order.
but to me, there seems only a handful of the same explanations used all the time to ‘explain’ market moves. they sound like talking points put out by someone – maybe goldman?
it is the macro picture, the big funds sales or purchases, large foreign goverment transactions these things move markets, but slowly.

daily stock futures are often stated to predict how the market may move. i think fc’s are entirely wrong on this. because statistically most lose on a stock futures gamble. it would probably be more accurate to bet the market will move that day in the opposite way of the futures sentiment. if most are placing puts, id guess the market would go up that day.

and on another subject – how come buying stocks are not taxed like everything else we buy? in this ‘cost cutting’ era why hasnt taxing stock purchases even discussed?
- example, on may 17 a total of $60,762,060,372 was spent on the stock market. if these was a sales tax of only .01% – that would bring in $607,620,603. or $3,038,103,018 – 3 billion $$ a week.
this tax, by the way, has been on the US communist party platform almost every election.

May 18, 2011 10:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.