Senior senators urge halt to Pakistan aid

Related Topics

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) arrives to meet with a bipartisan group of lawmakers and Vice President Joe Biden, to work on a legislative framework for comprehensive deficit reduction, at the Blair House in Washington May 10, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) arrives to meet with a bipartisan group of lawmakers and Vice President Joe Biden, to work on a legislative framework for comprehensive deficit reduction, at the Blair House in Washington May 10, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

WASHINGTON | Wed May 18, 2011 12:07pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several senior Senate Democrats are urging the Obama administration not to disburse any more security aid to Pakistan until it is sure Islamabad is not letting al Qaeda and other militant groups operate there.

After U.S. special forces found and killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in a Pakistan military town May 2, U.S. lawmakers from both parties are questioning whether billions of dollars in annual U.S. aid to Pakistan should continue.

The letter to Pentagon chief Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was written by Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein and Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, as well as Senators Robert Menendez, Ben Nelson and Jon Tester.

The discovery of bin Laden in the garrison town of Abbottabad "indicates, at a minimum, a lack of commitment by the Pakistani military to aggressive cooperation with the United States," the senators told Gates and Clinton.

"It is incongruous to be providing enormous sums to the Pakistani military unless we are certain that it is meeting its commitment to locate, disrupt and dismantle terrorist threats inside its borders," they said in the letter dated Tuesday.

"Prior to the provision of any additional assistance ... we urge you to assess Pakistan's commitment," they said.

Over $2 billion in security aid and reimbursements approved in mid-April by Congress could be held up.

Feinstein, Nelson and Tester are also on the Senate Appropriations Committee, which will help decide whether Congress will allocate Pakistan any more U.S. aid.

But some congressional leaders are urging caution, saying Pakistan has also lost many of its own soldiers fighting extremist groups in its border areas.

"This is not the time to start flexing our muscles," Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid told reporters on Tuesday. "This is the time to withhold judgment" until more is known about whether Pakistani officials knew where bin Laden was hiding.

Over the last decade, Congress has approved about $20 billion for Pakistan in economic aid and military reimbursements for helping to fight extremists in the region. About half of this has been security-related.

(Editing by Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
searider wrote:
Duplicity thy name is Pakistan !

There is no reason for the U.S. to pay for Pakistan’s defense. If they don’t think it’s important enough to concentrate upon then they deserve what they get. As far as using Pakistan to re-supply Afghanistan efforts, there’s no further reason for the U.S. to support that corrupt nation either. They don’t like us, they don’t want us, and they’d l;ike us to leave BUT, they want our money ????
Remove our soldiers from Afghanistan and there’s no further reason to justify sending money to Pakistan…. Too simple ? I guess so….

May 18, 2011 12:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PCScipio wrote:
It would be informative to know how much of the security aid these senators would like to see held up actually comes from firms in their states. I’ll bet not much.

May 18, 2011 1:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
4ngry4merican wrote:
Why does this even need to be “discussed” or “questioned”? This country is too broke to take care of its own citizens but we can send billions to a country who either knew or should have known that they were harboring the world’s worst terrorist? This shouldn’t even require debate.

May 18, 2011 2:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.