Deficit talks look at spending-cut compromises

Related Topics

Vice President Joe Biden smiles as he arrives to meet with a bipartisan group of lawmakers to work on a legislative framework for comprehensive deficit reduction at the Blair House in Washington, May 10, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Vice President Joe Biden smiles as he arrives to meet with a bipartisan group of lawmakers to work on a legislative framework for comprehensive deficit reduction at the Blair House in Washington, May 10, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

WASHINGTON | Wed May 25, 2011 2:36pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Deficit-reduction negotiators have identified broad areas for saving hundreds of billions of dollars but still disagree on changing the costly but popular Medicare program, a source familiar with the talks said on Wednesday.

Vice President Joe Biden and a bipartisan group of lawmakers have "some commonality" on the government programs that can be mined for cost-savings but still have to sketch in the details in negotiations that could stretch through July, said the aide, who asked not to be identified.

"A couple hundred billion dollars" in savings are being discussed for programs whose benefit levels are not set each year by Congress, the aide said.

The aide declined to say what programs would come under the knife, but both sides have backed cuts to farm subsidies, student loans and reforms to pension insurance.

Spending cuts totaling in "the high hundreds of billions, if not into the trillions," the aide added, could be achieved in programs that Congress decides funding levels for each year. Annual caps on these programs "certainly has been discussed" along with other ideas, the aide said.

These "discretionary" programs range from education and law enforcement to defense, transportation and worker assistance.

The Biden-led group, which includes two Republican congressional leaders and four high-profile Democrats, is scheduled to meet again on Thursday.

Besides figuring out how to cut chronic U.S. budget deficits in the range of $1.5 trillion annually, they hope to clear the way for a vote in Congress to increase the government's exhausted debt limit, which is now capped at $14.3 trillion.

Biden emerged from a nearly three-hour work session on Tuesday declaring he was optimistic of an eventual deal of "well above $1 trillion" in savings over a decade, as well as mechanisms for eventually saving $4 trillion.

The Medicare healthcare program for the elderly remains a sticking point, however, according to the aide, who said that Democrats have shown "a willingness" to discuss cuts but only if tax increases also are part of a deal.

The aide added, however, that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl both rejected any discussion of tax increases.

"A tax increase can't pass the House," the aide said.

Rising healthcare costs and the aging U.S. population will put continuing financial strains on the Medicare program.

House Republicans have embraced a budget that would make deep cuts in healthcare benefits to future retirees and would vastly change the way Medicare is run.

Public opinion polls have shown opposition to the plan that Democrats have been bashing.

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
“only if tax cuts are part of the deal”
hilarious!
The GOP should “allow” the left to raise taxes on everyone across the board and watch the squealing from the rabble begin

May 25, 2011 3:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
FBreughel1 wrote:
higher taxes are inevitable. but this way is fine, it will polarise society even quicker and really rapidly lead to a massive drop in consumer spending. every country has to learn.

May 25, 2011 3:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
DrJJJJ wrote:
No substitute for deep cuts, says Greenspan, Volker, etc etc! Moderate tax increases for all too-it’s too late! We’ve created a monster government with layers of expensive management, waste and corruption! We must to find the will to change into a lean, mean, as if operating for a profit machine and soon!10% across the board cuts each and every year until the budget is balanced would not be too much, too soon! If we wait, the civil unrest/suffering will be much worse! yes, the rich will have to flip the bill again but so should the rest of us reagrding tax increases!

May 25, 2011 4:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.