Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Texas to require photo identification from voters

Related Topics

Texas Governor Rick Perry makes a point at the Conservative Political Action conference (CPAC) in Washington, February 11, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Texas Governor Rick Perry makes a point at the Conservative Political Action conference (CPAC) in Washington, February 11, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

AUSTIN | Fri May 27, 2011 7:26pm EDT

AUSTIN (Reuters) - Texas Governor Rick Perry on Friday ceremonially signed a bill making Texas the twelfth state to require photo identification from voters.

"Today we take a major step forward in ensuring the integrity of our electoral process in Texas, a major step protecting the most cherished right that we enjoy as a people," Perry, joined by lawmakers who supported the legislation, told reporters.

The measure was one of the Republican governor's "emergency" legislative priorities for the session, and he's not alone. Republicans across the country are pushing such legislation. This year, more than 30 states have considered adding or strengthening voter identification requirements, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Photo ID requirements were signed into law in Wisconsin this week and in South Carolina earlier this month. Kansas also passed a photo ID measure this year that goes into effect January 1.

The requirement is already in place in Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan and South Dakota. Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton on Thursday vetoed a photo identification bill.

About 11 percent of American adults don't have photo identification, said Keesha Gaskins, senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law. Most states that have passed photo ID laws have not made it easier to get IDs, she said.

"The burdens are still there," said Gaskins, whose nonpartisan organization advocates for protecting voter rights. "Every one of these laws results in suppression of votes without any clear benefits," she added.

But many Republicans say the photo ID requirements deter voter fraud and drive up turnout by increasing voters' confidence in the system. They say it is not too much to ask voters to show photo identification, considering that photo ID is often required to cash a check or make a credit card purchase.

"We just wanted to make sure that when someone steps into that voting booth, that they were who they say they are," Texas State Senator Troy Fraser, the bill's author, said at the signing ceremony.

Democrats say voter impersonation is not a widespread problem, and often argue that requiring photo identification would suppress voter turnout, especially of elderly, low-income and minority voters who may be less likely to have a photo ID than others.

"In 2008, we had too many black folk, too many brown folk, too many poor folk voting," said Democratic state Representative David J. Mack II of South Carolina. As for Republicans, he said, "they can't have that in 2012."

Democrats point to a study by researchers at Rutgers University and Ohio State University, which found that in states that required voter identification, voters were about 3 percent less likely to vote in the 2004 presidential race than in states where voters just had to say their names.

Hispanics were about 10 percent less likely to vote, and blacks were about 6 percent less likely to vote.

Republicans point to the experience in Indiana, where a 2005 photo ID law was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Jerry Bonnet, general counsel of the Indiana Secretary of State's office, told a Texas Senate committee earlier this year that his state's law didn't hurt voter turnout.

"If the naysayers and conspiracy theorists and armchair social scientists were correct in their prognostications, Indiana would have experienced hundreds of thousands of disenfranchised voters," Bonnet said.

"But hardly any group or individual or circumstance has been found that has genuinely disenfranchised or inconvenienced a voter."

Under the Texas measure, voters will be required to show photo identification such as a driver's license or passport.

Current law in the Lone Star State says that voters have to show a voter registration card -- which does not have a photo -- or an acceptable alternative, such as a driver's license or a utility bill.

(Additional reporting by Harriet McLeod in Charleston, South Carolina; Editing by Jerry Norton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
OrthoPraxis wrote:
Well, apparently proving your identity and, thus, your right to vote, is worthy of national news. This is pretty obvious — you get to vote if you are a citizen, you have to prove you are a citizen in pretty much every other realm of life.

May 27, 2011 9:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Jen06 wrote:
I live in a small town and have to show a photo ID EVERY time I vote. Doesn’t matter that most all the poll workers call me by name and let me know if any of my daughters have been in yet. One of them lives down the street from me and one worked with my husband for years. Not only do they ask for my ID but they compare the photo on it to me and carefully check that the signature on the ID matches the one in the registry. Am I “offended”? Absolutely not – they are taking their job seriously. If an ID helps to prevent voter fraud I am all for it. Maybe it’ll put the brakes on the tried and true dem motto, “Vote early, vote often”.

May 28, 2011 1:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
chiefbuffalo wrote:
It is only logical that you have to prove that you are eligible to vote since only citizens are by law able to vote and as it should be. Since you have to show proof of identity for everything else in our society, then why do the Democrats cry foul every time the subject brought up. Could it be that they cheat at the polls? oh! no! not the Democrats trying to steal election. They claim that it will hurt the poor and disadvantaged. Baloney! How many unregistered voters have been to the polls in recent times, including illegals, that is why the law is necessary!

May 28, 2011 2:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.