Pentagon says impact of Lockheed attack "minimal"

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Sat May 28, 2011 11:05pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Defense Department said the impact on the Pentagon of a cyber attack on Lockheed Martin Corp had been "minimal" and it expected no harm to result.

"Impact to DoD is minimal and we don't expect any adverse effect," Lieutenant Colonel April Cunningham said in an emailed reply to Reuters. "As a matter of standing DoD policy, we do not comment on operational matters."

(Reporting by Jim Wolf, editing by Will Dunham)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
charlie651 wrote:
Here is a news flash. The United States, including the Defense Department, would never publicly admit that anyone had a successful “cyber attack” on one of our Defense Department contractors. For the DoD to say the “Impact to DoD is minimal” has no bearing on anything. What does “minimal” mean? Does it mean the DoD is going to minimize the true effect the cyber attack had? Does it mean the attack was minimal because it could have caused far more damage than it did? Does it mean only a defense contractor was affected and no one else, including a more direct hit on the DoD?

The DoD also said “we don’t expect any adverse effect.” Naturally, they don’t expect any “adverse effect,” because they know exactly what the “adverse effects” were and, therefore, they are not expecting anything; they are actually reacting to what happened and trying to preventing another successful attack like the one they just received.

The DoD didn’t mention the extent of the damage caused by the cyber attack. Nor was it mentioned what weakness in internet security its defense contractors had. If the DoD has these weakness in internet security just think how weak our financial institutions internet security is. Just pray tell who is going to be fired for not preventing the successful cyber attack against a DoD contractor?

May 29, 2011 8:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.