Germans miss point with nuclear shutdown date: Sweden

A traffic sign meaning 'Caution' is seen in front of the cooling tower of nuclear power plants ''Isar 1+2'' between the southern Bavarian villages of Niederaichbach and Essenbach near Landshut April 2, 2011. REUTERS/Michaela Rehle

A traffic sign meaning 'Caution' is seen in front of the cooling tower of nuclear power plants ''Isar 1+2'' between the southern Bavarian villages of Niederaichbach and Essenbach near Landshut April 2, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Michaela Rehle

STOCKHOLM | Mon May 30, 2011 8:16am EDT

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Setting a date to shut down Germany's nuclear power stations is the wrong approach by the country and it should instead focus on boosting the use of renewable energy, Sweden said on Monday.

Germany's coalition government has decided to keep permanently shut the country's eight oldest reactors and the rest by 2022 in response to Japan's Fukushima disaster. The decision was a dramatic policy reversal.

Sweden's state-owned power group Vattenfall operates two of the nuclear plants, though these have been offline since 2007. It is a minority holder in a third plant.

"The important thing is not the year nuclear power stops, the important thing is to build out renewable energy so that one reduces dependency on nuclear power and climate emissions," Swedish Environment Minister Andreas Carlgren told public radio.

He said Germany had lagged behind in promoting renewable energy and that such a stance led "to a very fitful energy policy" which was not good for a country.

"In Sweden we have done all we can to avoid this," he said.

Germany would also have to import nuclear power from France and boost its reliance on power from fossil fuel, he said.

"They put themselves at risk of not meeting the double challenge we have to reduce dependency on nuclear power and to reduce climate emissions," he added.

Carlgren said he would not comment on whether Vattenfall faced any losses from the German decision and that it was up to Vattenfall to make that call first.

Vattenfall has said it will not comment until the German government takes the formal shutdown decision on June 6.

(Reporting by Patrick Lannin; editing by James Jukwey)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Why?

40 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2025 and 80 percent by 2050 is the right target. It could not be more relevant to the “challenge”.

May 30, 2011 2:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Hinh wrote:
Germany has had the best foreign policy in Europe and on the international scene during the last decade. Now it is taking the lead again with this decision of phasing out nuclear power. While it is easy to criticize as being merely a fake solution (if importing nuclear produced electricity from France or other countries for instance), Germany has the brain power, the creative and engineering resource to research, develop and grow economically without nuclear in the next decades. I believe this is the right decision, that it should be applauded and that other countries in Europe and in the world should emulate and implement the same choice.

May 30, 2011 6:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
kevin24 wrote:
Great that Germany admits the truth about nuclear power. However the waste that has been produced must be dealt with and we still need electricity. There is a solution to these problems, and that is Thorium. Liquid Floride Thorium Reactors (LFTR) are safe. They are not under pressure so they will not explode. They actually burn spent uranium fuel, rendering it safe in a mere 300 years.

I urge everyone to look into LFTR power and to urge your country’s governments to aid the transition from Fossil fuels and very dangerous uranium to safe and abundant Thorium power.

Jun 01, 2011 1:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.