Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Florida to test all welfare recipients for drugs

Related Topics

TALLAHASSEE, Florida | Tue May 31, 2011 6:06pm EDT

TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Florida will begin testing welfare recipients for illicit drug use under a new law signed by Governor Rick Scott on Tuesday.

The measure makes Florida the only state to test all recipients of the federal program known as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, according a Washington-based public policy group that says other states have chosen less obtrusive ways to monitor drug use.

The new law, a version of which was struck down by a federal court in Michigan in 2003, requires recipients to pay for the tests before qualifying for benefits and periodically after they receive them.

The law was one of Scott's campaign promises. Supporters say it will help ensure that taxpayer money is used to get families on their feet and not to fuel drug habits at state expense.

"While there are certainly legitimate needs for public assistance, it is unfair for Florida taxpayers to subsidize drug addiction," Scott said in a statement released after he signed the bill during a visit to Panama City.

"This new law will encourage personal accountability and will help to prevent the misuse of tax dollars."

Beginning July 1, recipients who test positive for drugs would be denied benefits for a year. A second failed test would result in a three-year ban.

In two-parent households, both adults would be tested. Benefits to children could be awarded to a third-party recipient, who must also pass a drug screen.

The law will not affect the federal food stamp program.

Critics, including the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida and Florida Legal Services, said they will decide in coming weeks if they plan to file suit against the law on the grounds that blanket drug tests are unconstitutional.

Federal law allows states to screen for drug use under the TANF program, which provides a maximum $300 a month cash assistance to needy families. The program, which replaced traditional welfare in the mid 1990s, has a 48-month lifetime cap on benefits.

Other states have studied the issue and decided testing all recipients was not cost effective, the Washington-based Center for Legal and Social Policy said in a study released in January.

Most states have drug assessment programs that do not include urine or blood tests. Some require drug tests from recipients who have been convicted of felony drug crimes.

During debate about the law, critics pointed to a pilot testing program in Florida that was shut down in 2001 after it showed no significant difference in drug use between welfare recipients and the population at large.

"The wasteful program created by this law subjects Floridians who are impacted by the economic downturn, as well as their families, to a humiliating search of their urine and body fluids without cause or even suspicion of drug abuse," said Howard Simon, executive director of ACLU Florida, in a statement.

(Editing by Colleen Jenkins and Ellen Wulfhorst)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
wrote:
The part that they didn’t mention is that these welfare recipients will have to get tested at one of his wife’s walk-in clinics (Solantics) which are located all over the state. Florida state workers who file state Workman’s Comp claims also have to go through this clinic. And, it’s useless to file a “conflict of interest” suit against him (Scott) because if it reaches the state supreme court, which is stacked with republican judges, they will throw it out anyway.

May 31, 2011 6:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PaulBegala wrote:
Here’s a better idea:

STOP PAYING PEOPLE TO DO NOTHING !!!!!!

Are you intelligent enough to see how liberalism is destroying America? Why is the federal government paying people NOT to work !!

May 31, 2011 6:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
TeeLofton wrote:
Well I fell like ARE they offering any type of counseling for the
parents that test positive, because the crime rate is going to go
up due to how are these families going to eat and pay there bills
and in a way you are using the kids (that will be the ones to suffer)
to what, help tax payers…I’m too am a taxpayer that would never agree
to some of the requirements of this bill.To take away benefits from parents
for a year or two that test positive ithout offering counseling in my opinion
is a bit muchoffer counseling to the parents that test postive and after 3
postives test then take it away for about 6 months.I see that you listen to the
tax payers but someone that is temporary having hard time why not consider there
thoughts on this too. If you read my response I did not say NO dont do it im just
saying do it for everyone…SN: and if people is applying for this assistnace
where in the world are they going to get $35 in advance to pay for a drug test
when people are trying to feed there kids. High gas prices, minimum jobs,
forclosure homes, no food, no where to stay and now this…where is the
humanity in this what about the parents that DO NOT DO ANY DRUGS why do they
have to upfront $35 for an drug test IF YOU TREAT PEOPLE WITH NO TRUST THAT IS
WHAT YOU WILL GET IN RETURN…I will pray for everyone (TAX PAYERS TOO) during
these hard times… If I was blessed to have a BIG bank account
(and my my family were good) why would I not want to help someone else feed
there family and keep a roof over there head.
I thought the United States Constitution headed WE THE PEOPLE..
(NOT JUST TAX PAYERS).

May 31, 2011 7:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.