Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Libya rebels are not revising oil deals: source

Related Topics

BENGHAZI, Libya | Thu Jun 2, 2011 1:41pm EDT

BENGHAZI, Libya (Reuters) - Libyan rebel officials are in contact with top oil companies that operate in the north African country but no new contracts are being drawn up, a source in the rebel leadership said.

Information and pricing agency Platts reported this week that the rebel National Transitional Council (NTC) was in preliminary talks with Italy over a possible renegotiation of a production-sharing deal for Libya's Bouri offshore field.

It said the talks might result in the rebels taking charge of the stake in the field owned by Libya's state National Oil Corporation, which operates Bouri in association with Italy's Eni.

"We are having talks with top companies that operate in Libya, but we are not making new contracts," the source in the Benghazi-based national council told Reuters.

Officials in the rebel leadership have played down the likelihood that they will tear up Libya's revenue sharing agreements with foreign oil majors, saying they will respect contracts signed by NOC.

Abdeljalil Mayouf, information manager at Arab Gulf Oil Company (Agoco), said he was not aware of any re-negotiation of deals between Tripoli-based NOC, which remains under the control of leader Muammar Gaddafi's government, and foreign oil firms.

After throwing off Gaddafi's control in most of east Libya in February, the rebels named officials to take charge of energy policy while they try to topple Gaddafi in the west.

The rebels are in dire need of oil export revenues to pay state salaries and buy weapons and food and sold their first tanker full of crude to U.S. refiner Tesoro in April.

But hydrocarbon production and exports have ground largely to a halt across the country due to an embargo on firms linked to Gaddafi's government and threats to the security of oilfields and pipelines in the east.

The rebel finance minister said on Sunday he did not expect oil production in the rebel-held east to restart in the near future until security was restored.

Libya was producing around 1.6 million barrels per day of oil and exporting some 1.3 million bpd before the unrest.

Eni, the biggest foreign oil company in Libya, is trying to find a way to make exporting oil from Libya work without running afoul of sanctions, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters in Italy.

(Reporting by Sherine El Madany in Benghazi; Additional reporting by Deepa Babington in Rome; Editing by Tom Pfeiffer and Anthony Barker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
ushivon wrote:
Can it be any clearer that the rebels all along did not have grievance weith the government but were after the oil? Three ships have sailed loaded with oil netting the rebels 480 million dollars.
Can you imagine the rebels in the UK being aided by foreign powers to empty the cash from the vaults? A minority of armed rebels, with the aid of a coalition of foreign powers who bomb the daylights out of Libya, killing over 700 civillians in cold blood, bombing universities, schools and hospitals, and ruining the cities, are stealing from their fellow countrymen the nation’s wealth?
This is the purpose of the rebellion.
Is it coincidence that the rebels include defecting ministers whose personal wealth was taken from the country in excess to what they were entitled?
There is nothing humanitarian about unleashing thousands of bombs onto a country and to target popular governments and respected heads of nations.
WE have more reasons for wanting rid of Gaddafi than oil. He is set to deliver Africa from debt and slavery to the IMF, foreign interests and imperialist powers which, like vampires, suck the wealth out of Africa leaving her perpetually weak.
This war is about rascism where the emancipation of Africa will not be allowed becasue it does not suit us.
I admire Gaddafi enormously and I am ashamed to be British.

Jun 03, 2011 7:16am EDT  --  Report as abuse
cleanelectric wrote:
We got involved in Libya when their own citizens revolted against thier dictatorship leadership. (Following the lead of citizens in other Muslim countries who revolted against thier leadership in favor of Democracy, from Tunisia to Egypt, Bahrain and Yemen.

Boehner and other republicans want to take advantage of this by asking that Congress (not the President)controlls our military there.

WHY? So that He and other politicians who are invested in the oil business can simply go in with our troops and TAKE Libya’s Oil, like the guiltless, unethical bully’s that they are.

Jun 03, 2011 7:44am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.