U.S. weighs security after "serious" Google allegation

WASHINGTON Thu Jun 2, 2011 2:56pm EDT

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addresses the Washington Conference on the Americas at the State Department in Washington May 11, 2011. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addresses the Washington Conference on the Americas at the State Department in Washington May 11, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Washington scrambled on Thursday to assess whether security had been compromised after Google Inc revealed a major hacker attack targeting U.S. officials that the Internet giant pegged to China.

"These allegations are very serious," Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said.

"We take them seriously; we're looking into them," Clinton told reporters a day after the Internet giant said it had disrupted a campaign aimed at stealing passwords of hundreds of Google email account holders, including senior U.S. government officials, Chinese activists and journalists.

Google's announcement fuels debate in Washington over China's intentions in cyberspace, which the United States has identified as a potential flashpoint for future conflict.

Blackberry maker Research In Motion and Microsoft Corp. could get a boost from the Google hacking incident. The companies have been fending off competitive challenges from Google's Android software and cloud computing services, as the corporate sector and the federal government explore whether Google is a secure alternative for email.

Neither Google nor the U.S. government has said the Chinese government was behind the attacks, and the U.S. State Department said it had not raised the issue with Beijing.

Google only said the attack appeared to originate in China.

Beijing nevertheless reacted angrily to Google's charge, saying it was "unacceptable" to blame Beijing and allegations that China supports hacking "have ulterior motives".

Clinton said Google told the State Department before it made its public announcement on Wednesday, and the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation was investigating, with Google.

The White House said it had no reason to believe official government emails were hacked in the Google incident, and officials at many agencies stressed that government employees were directed not to use private accounts to discuss sensitive issues.

"Rule number one is: don't do anything stupid," one national security official said.

Some agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, block employees from accessing personal accounts from work. But there is no blanket ban and other agencies do allow it.

"Those of us who do run private accounts are very, very mindful of the security issues," Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Gary Roughead told Reuters.

Still, the government will check whether senior officials' private accounts were targeted, said one official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

"There is a lot of awareness that whether it's a hostile intelligence service or others who may want to access this," the official said.

DUELING IN CYBERSPACE

Google's latest salvo looked likely to bring Internet policy to the foreground in the U.S-China relationship, where Washington and Beijing have staked out sharply contrasting approaches to censorship, freedom of speech and cybersecurity.

The United States was drawn in last year when Google temporarily shut its Chinese-language portal over censorship concerns and a cyber attack it said was traced to China. Clinton also has accused Beijing of facing a "dictator's dilemma" as it seeks to control technologies that are fueling growth and free speech around the world.

The dispute over the Internet has at times amplified existing strains in the U.S.-China relationship on everything from human rights and trade to intellectual property rights.

The United States has warned that a devastating cyberattack could result in real-world military retaliation, although analysts say it could be difficult to detect its origin with full accuracy.

The White House and the State Department have appointed officials to oversee cybersecurity issues. The Pentagon probably has the most developed strategy in the U.S. government, with a Cyber Command and thousands of people in different divisions of the military dedicated to matters of cybersecurity and cyberwafare.

The State Department's cyber coordinator, Christopher Painter, called cyber security a diplomatic priority for the United States as it seeks to defend itself from threats ranging from freelance hackers to militants to potential rival states.

"The most important thing is to build international consensus....It's not just China that we need to engage with. It is an important part of our agenda with every country," Painter told Reuters on the sidelines of a London conference.

(Additional reporting by Arshad Mohammed, Phil Stewart, Mark Hosenball, Sarah Lynch and Andrea Shalal-Esa in Washington and Peter Apps in London; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
bao wrote:
I remember when the US investigated WMD in Iraq, and concluded that Saddam was gonna destroy the Western world. In the end, we killed Saddam and his sons, signed a bunch of oil contracts, and turned Iraq into a big mess while we inflated the cost of old houses.

Probably starting something with China will allow us to inflate the cost of everything made in China, thereby justifying the printing of massive amounts of money which somehow end up in the hands of a few bankers once again.

Jun 02, 2011 12:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bao wrote:
I remember when the US investigated WMD in Iraq, and concluded that Saddam was gonna destroy the Western world. In the end, we killed Saddam and his sons, signed a bunch of oil contracts, and turned Iraq into a big mess while we inflated the cost of old houses.

Probably starting something with China will allow us to inflate the cost of everything made in China, thereby justifying the printing of massive amounts of money which somehow end up in the hands of a few bankers once again.

Jun 02, 2011 12:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bokababu wrote:
Why is that GOOGLE always clains that the hackers originated in CHINA.
with todays technology its not too hard to find out the footprints.

Only the requiremnet is will USA be MAN enough to point to CHINA , now that all mfg products come from china and all our items are made with chinese slave labour except for chocolates that is made with CHILD slave labour form ivory coast!

Jun 02, 2011 1:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Track China's Leaders