Airline profits to tumble in 2011 on fuel, global

SINGAPORE Mon Jun 6, 2011 4:59am EDT

An aircraft takes off at Cointrin airport in Geneva in this December 8, 2008 file photo. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/Files

An aircraft takes off at Cointrin airport in Geneva in this December 8, 2008 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Denis Balibouse/Files

Related Video

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Global airlines cut their 2011 profit forecast by more than half to $4 billion on Monday as high oil prices and turmoil in Japan, North Africa and the Middle East weigh on the industry's recovery.

The International Air Transport Association (IATA), which represents most global carriers, also warned of a looming trade war if Europe moves ahead with plans to force airlines to join an emissions trading scheme next year. China said it would support legal action.

Airlines say the scheme, designed to tackle growing emissions from the aviation industry, will only increase costs and add to pressures already caused by the sluggish global economy.

"The efficiency gains of the last decade and the strengthening global economic environment are balancing the high price of fuel," the IATA's director general, Giovanni Bisignani, told the group's annual general meeting in Singapore.

"But with a dismal 0.7 percent margin, there is little buffer left against further shocks," he said.

The IATA $4 billion profit forecast compares with an $8.6 billion forecast on March 2, just before the Japan earthquake and tsunami triggered a nuclear meltdown at a power station. Since then, the Arab uprisings have spread and oil prices have traded well above $100 a barrel.

The forecast would also mark a drop of more than three-quarters from the industry's estimated 2010 profit, which was raised to $18 billion from $16 billion.

Economists say the industry's outlook is a guide to the strength of cyclical recovery in developed markets and growth in emerging economies, which rely heavily on air transport.

Airlines rebounded faster than expected from recession last year, helped by higher traffic and a drive to keep a lid on spare capacity. But far too rapid expansion in capacity, a series of external shocks and higher oil prices have hit the industry hard this year.

Airlines had been bracing for lower 2011 forecasts at this week's major conference as fears grow over the global economy.

IATA is forecasting a $110 per barrel average oil price in 2011, up 15 percent from $96 last year, adding to the case for airlines to raise airfares or fuel surcharges to cover the rising cost of doing business.

Qantas Airways was "looking at more increases going forward," its chief executive, Alan Joyce, told Reuters. "Hedging just gives you time."

IATA warned that capacity was set to expand 5.8 percent in 2011, outstripping a 4.7 percent increase in demand. The 1.1 percentage point gap is sharply higher than the 0.3 percent previously forecast.

Bisignani has said a lack of discipline could dent the industry's recovery as airlines jostle for market share.

OTHER COSTS

In a move with major cost implications for the industry, Rolls-Royce is set to build a new engine to beef up the A350 jetliner being developed by Airbus, industry sources said.

Until now, Airbus and Rolls had defended the engine as an all-rounder capable of powering three separate models of the mid-sized A350, which is designed to carry 270 to 350 people.

In Europe, the EU's planned Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) would force carriers to buy permits for each tonne of carbon dioxide they emit above a certain cap.

The plan is meant to tackle growing emissions from the $500 billion aviation industry, which is responsible for about 2 percent of mankind's greenhouse gas pollution.

Governments and airlines have been piling on pressure, some describing the forced inclusion of global airlines as illegal.

The EU has offered to exempt airlines of countries that can prove they are taking equivalent steps to cut emissions.

Representatives from developing countries slammed the proposed rules and said they were unfair.

"Indian airlines which fly overseas, such as Kingfisher, have already made their views known to the minister of civil aviation," said Vijay Mallya, chairman of Kingfisher Airlines, which has the second-largest market share of India's aviation industry.

"We do not have the same level of sophistication or maturity in trading of carbon credits and therefore any such new policy or levy on Indian carriers flying to Europe would be unfair. Now it's a government-to-government matter, not an airline specific matter," he said.

The China Air Transport Association (CATA) says the scheme will cost Chinese airlines more than $100 million in the first year and more than triple that by 2020.

"I believe we have to take legal action," said Wei Zhenzhong, secretary general of CATA, adding that Air China was preparing a legal challenge. The U.S. industry group Air Transport Association of America is also challenging the plan in EU courts.

What is needed is a global approach to emissions control, Singapore's deputy prime minister, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, told IATA delegates.

"In addressing climate change, we should harmonize measures at an international level so as to ensure a level playing field for all, as well as minimize multiple cost layers from unilateral localized emissions trading schemes and environmental taxes," he said.

(Additional reporting by Tim Hepher, Raju Gopalakrishnan, Alison Leung, Harry Suhartono and Kevin Lim; Editing by Matt Driskill; +65 6870 3720)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
forteinjeff wrote:
So now we’re going to add another tax because of airplanes contributing 2% of the global warming problem. Great idea, but now how are we going to go after the other 98% of the global warming problem makers like you and me when we run off to work and go shopping in our cars? In most 3rd world nations they haven’t even heard of catalytic converters or LED light bulbs yet once again those of us who use them are going to pay more for everything – including air shipping costs. Coming up with new ways in taxing us more has become a worldwide favorite pastime. Too bad they can’t realize that they’re making us so poor we don’t have any money left over to spend on the things they’re trying to sell.

Jun 06, 2011 10:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.