Fed's Plosser: Jobs data doesn't change view

HELSINKI/NEW YORK Mon Jun 6, 2011 9:10am EDT

Philadelphia Federal Reserve President Charles Plosser speaks at an Economics21 event in New York, March 25, 2011. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Philadelphia Federal Reserve President Charles Plosser speaks at an Economics21 event in New York, March 25, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid

Related Topics

HELSINKI/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Weak jobs figures on Friday do not change the fundamental outlook for the U.S. economy and monetary policy could be tightened by the end of the year, a top Federal Reserve official said on Monday.

Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Plosser, a well-known inflation hawk who has a vote on policy this year, has said he believes the U.S. economy was in a gradual recovery.

"Certainly, the employment numbers that came out in the United States on Friday were disappointing... But I'm not seeing anything fundamental has changed in my view of the medium term outlook," he told reporters after a conference in Helsinki.

Asked about the chances of tighter policy in 2011, he said: "It's certainly possible by the end of the year," though he added much depended on how the economy performed.

U.S. nonfarm payrolls data on Friday showed employment rose by 54,000 last month, just over a third of what economists had expected, adding to growing concerns among economists about the strength of the world's largest economy.

He said it was still difficult to draw consistent conclusions on the impact of the Fed's second round of quantitative easing to support growth, dubbed "QE2." Financial markets have begun to discuss the chances of the Fed eventually embarking on another such round of easing -- for now seen as a very remote possibility.

Asked about a possible "QE3," Plosser said: "The hurdle rate for doing more is very high."


Plosser, attending a conference hosted by the Global Interdependence Center and the Bank of Finland, also said that the American public's swing from deflation to inflation worries in the past year is "troubling."

The volatility suggests people have doubts about the Fed's ability to keep prices stable, he said, adding that confidence in the Fed is critical if the U.S. central bank is to exit easy policy without triggering higher inflation or hurting growth.

"It is troubling that the public's inflation concerns can be so volatile," he said.

"It suggests that there may be less confidence in the credibility of the Fed's commitment to price stability than we might desire," Plosser said.

Last summer, concerns the U.S. could face a sustained period of falling prices prompted the Fed to step in with the QE2 program, which is scheduled to end this month.

Recently, rising food and energy prices have fueled concerns about inflation. The Fed believes commodity price rises will be temporary and won't have a lasting impact on inflation.

Plosser said these swings in the public debate shows the need for clear communication from the Fed. He repeated his long-standing call for an explicit inflation target and a systematic exit plan from the Fed's extraordinarily easy monetary policy.

"Given the extraordinary amount of liquidity present in the U.S. banking system, it is reasonable for the public to be concerned about the prospects for inflation down the road," said Plosser, who has a vote on Fed policy this year.

The Fed cut interest rates at record lows near zero since December 2008 and has kept them there since. It has also bought bonds to further support the economic recovery, more than tripling its balance sheet to around $2.7 trillion.


At its April meeting, the Fed signaled it was in no rush to tighten monetary policy. But minutes of that meeting showed policymakers discussed potential exit strategy options at length.

Plosser said as the Fed normalizes policy, it should return to an operating framework in which the benchmark federal funds rate is the primary instrument of monetary policy. In this framework, the Fed's balance sheet should shrink to "probably less than $1 trillion" so that the fed funds rate trades above the interest on excess reserves.

The interest on excess reserves is a new tool that Congress gave the Federal Reserve's Washington-based Board of Governors -- not the Fed's policy-setting committee -- during the financial crisis.

Plosser said he would find a "floor system" framework in which the interest on excess reserves rate is the de facto policy rate "troubling" as it puts no limit on the size of the balance sheet.

"If our operating framework divorces our balance-sheet decisions from monetary policy, it becomes a tempting instrument for future policymakers inside or outside the central bank to use it for non-monetary-policy purposes," Plosser said.

"This could jeopardize the independence of the central bank and, if abused, would be a source of many unforeseen problems."

(Reporting by Ritsuko Ando in Helsinki and Kristina Cooke in New York; Editing by Patrick Graham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
threeRivers wrote:
can someone explain why the money multiplier, which we used to spent a lot of time studying in school, isn’t even mentioned anymore? the FRED chart is awesome, but irrelevant. Why?

Jun 06, 2011 6:02am EDT  --  Report as abuse
wesatch wrote:
Another Fed statement of true brilliance and compassion for real human beings?

“It suggests that there may be less confidence in the credibility of the Fed’s commitment to price stability than we might desire,” Plosser

Soggests, Ha? These folks are so removed from the real world.

Less confidence, what genius. In three years you and your cohorts have stripped the wealth of savers, retirees and the prudent by over $600 billion a year with negative interest rates for depositors. Handing the booty of fat spreads to banks, speculators, deadbeats, debtors, wall street and of course federal deficit financing.

That the Fed has a creditability problem is an understatement. The Fed is perceived as the lackey of Wall Street and the enemy of those who have been financially responsible.

If Plosser was that concerned he would have resigned in protest as Hoenig should have instead of acquiescing to Bernanke, Yellen and the rest of the wrong headed professors on the Fed board.

At lease he didn’t tell us something was un-anchored, anchored, or that hole in our pocket from food and oil inflation was merely transitory. But you can always eat an iPad, right, Dudley?

Jun 06, 2011 6:37am EDT  --  Report as abuse
minipaws wrote:
Duh, Quit printing money and intervening!

Jun 06, 2011 8:17am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

California state worker Albert Jagow (L) goes over his retirement options with Calpers Retirement Program Specialist JeanAnn Kirkpatrick at the Calpers regional office in Sacramento, California October 21, 2009. Calpers, the largest U.S. public pension fund, manages retirement benefits for more than 1.6 million people, with assets comparable in value to the entire GDP of Israel. The Calpers investment portfolio had a historic drop in value, going from a peak of $250 billion in the fall of 2007 to $167 billion in March 2009, a loss of about a third during that period. It is now around $200 billion. REUTERS/Max Whittaker   (UNITED STATES) - RTXPWOZ

How to get out of debt

Financial adviser Eric Brotman offers strategies for cutting debt from student loans and elder care -- and how to avoid money woes in the first place.  Video