Iran says no offer can stop it enriching uranium

Related Topics

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks during a news conference in Tehran June 7, 2011. REUTERS/Raheb Homavandi

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks during a news conference in Tehran June 7, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Raheb Homavandi

TEHRAN | Tue Jun 7, 2011 1:24pm EDT

TEHRAN (Reuters) - No offer from world powers can persuade Iran to stop enriching uranium, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Tuesday, dismissing the key demand of countries that fear Tehran is developing nuclear weapons.

A day after the U.N. atomic watchdog said it had new evidence of possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear work, Ahmadinejad accused it of doing Washington's bidding and said Tehran's atomic advances had "no brake and no reverse gear."

The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Yukiya Amano, said on Monday the IAEA had received "further information ... that seems to point to the existence of possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program."

That contradicts Iran's insistence that its nuclear work is for entirely peaceful purposes, and Ahmadinejad made clear his displeasure with the Japanese IAEA chief who has taken a blunter approach than his Egyptian predecessor Mohamed ElBaradei.

"With America's orders (the IAEA) has written some things in a report that are against the law and against the agency's regulations," Ahmadinejad told reporters.

"These have no legal value and aside from harming the agency's reputation it will have no other effect."

Tehran says sanctions imposed by Washington, Europe and the United Nations are not hitting its economy and insists they will not force it to give up what it considers its sovereign right to enrich uranium, a process that can make fuel for power plants or, by enriching uranium more highly, provide bomb material.

NO REVERSE

"I have said before that Iran's nuclear train has no brake and no reverse gear ... We will continue our path," Ahmadinejad said, adding that Iran would continue to cooperate with the IAEA "as long as they move based on justice."

Asked whether the world powers that have held talks with Tehran in the past to seek an end to the nuclear impasse could offer any incentive to stop Iran's enrichment, he answered with the one word: "No."

Two rounds of talks between Iran and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France, plus Germany (P5+1), in Geneva in December and in Istanbul in January, did not reach any substantive result.

Iran has said it is willing to resume talks, but its insistence that other countries recognize its right to enrich uranium is a major stumbling block, particularly for Western diplomats who see it as an unacceptable pre-condition.

The EU foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton, who represented the P5+1 at the talks, said last month she wanted a "stronger and better" reply from Iran to her call to revive the talks.

Israel and the United States say they do not rule out pre-emptive military strikes to stop Iran making nuclear bombs.

As well as blaming Washington for Amano's comments, Ahmadinejad used his news conference to condemn U.S. interference in the Middle East, including Bahrain, the tiny Gulf island state that hosts the U.S. Fifth Fleet and whose crackdown on pro-democracy protests Tehran has condemned.

"The problem is not between the authorities and the people, the problem is America's military base in Bahrain," he said.

On Syria, Iran's main ally in the region in its stand against Israel, he said: "I condemn the interference of America and its allies ... We believe that Syrians themselves are capable of managing their own affairs."

There are U.S. troops in two of Iran's neighbors -- Iraq and Afghanistan -- and Ahmadinejad predicted Washington would try to extend its presence in a third -- nuclear armed Pakistan.

"We have information that in order to gain more control over Pakistan, to weaken the Pakistani nation and government, the Americans want to sabotage Pakistan's nuclear facilities," he said, adding that damage to nuclear plants would be a pretext for a greater U.S. presence in the country.

(Additional reporting Zahra Hosseinian and by Sylvia Westall in Vienna; Writing by Robin Pomeroy; editing by Tim Pearce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
DanielSa wrote:
I will be much happy if Iran doesn’t possess nuclear weapons. Prevention of such extreme possibility is very important. After possession, Iran aggressiveness may reach dangerous level on international scene, especially near Iran borders and/or against Israel. Also international action against Iran will face nuclear threat.
Of course, nobody can precisely predict Iran future. That’s why is wise for international community to start military action as soon as possible, locate and destroy Iran nuclear weapons facilities, and immediately leave this country. Latter may be very hard or even too late. Diplomacy with Iran, regarding nuclear issue, has already proved itself useless. Iran is obviously buying time, and international community risk is higher and higher.

Jun 08, 2011 7:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.