Wealth and Investing Center

Don't fire pension managers for speaking up: NYC

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Tue Jun 7, 2011 6:50pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York City should not fire outside pension managers whose views clash with those of the pension trustees, a city official said on Monday, responding to a controversy over remarks by a Blackstone Group LP manager.

Trustees of New York City's police pension fund are considering a motion to give them this new power, a development that illustrates one of the ways unions are seeking to make their opinions heard in the public sphere.

Department of Finance Commissioner David Frankel, in a letter to the police pension trustees, said he opposed the motion.

"This clause is likely an unconstitutional restraint of free speech, is wholly unnecessary, and threatens to distract the board from its fiduciary obligation to invest fund assets in the best interest of its members," he said.

Last year, Byron Wien, Blackstone's economic adviser, was quoted as saying that retirement benefits for state workers are too generous.

"The retirement benefits for state workers, really not only in New York, California and New Jersey, but throughout the country, are very generous. Too generous," Wien was quoted in June by Pensions & Investments publication as saying during a webcast.

New York City pension funds had pressed Blackstone to repudiate those comments, Bloomberg, the news agency, earlier reported.

A spokesman for Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the mayor supports the policy, articulated by his finance commissioner. Spokesmen for Blackstone and city Comptroller John Liu, who helps manage the city's pension funds, had no immediate comment.

(Reporting by Joan Gralla)

(This article has been modified to correct the 8th paragraph to show that the mayor supports the policy; removes reference that mayoral spokesman had no comment)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Acetracy wrote:
NY Pensions should lead the way in vetting out money managers who use the fees they earn of workers’ savings to pay for anti-union, anti-labor political parties. Remember the South African boycott of firms that supported apartheid? It is the same logic. Speak with your pocket book.

Blackstone is a perfect example. The firm gets huge tax breaks for NYC plus makes $billions from public pensions, yet their senior CEO goes out and blasts the few organizations left in the USA that actual fight for the average Joe. I don’t belong to a union as most US workers don’t either. However, everyone I talk to wish they had a union to speak on their behalf and have some leverage over management that fires/hires at will while enriching their own pocket.

And before you think unions are a no-growth, anti-capitalist vestige of some leftist weirdo, take a look at the economic engine of Germany where the majority of its industrial workforce is unionized.

Jun 08, 2011 7:45am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.