Prostate drugs raise risk of prostate cancer: FDA

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Jun 9, 2011 2:27pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A class of drugs meant to improve symptoms of an enlarged prostate gland actually increase the chance of getting a more serious form of prostate cancer, health officials said on Thursday.

However, they also said the drugs' benefits outweigh the risks.

The drugs in this group include Merck & Co's Proscar and GlaxoSmithKline's Avodar and Jalyn, as well as Merck's Propecia, which is approved to treat male pattern hair loss.

The Food and Drug Administration said it revised the labels on all such drugs, called 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI), to include the risk after reviewing two large studies.

The randomized controlled studies found that daily use of 5-ARIs for several years decreased the chance of getting lower-risk forms of prostate cancer but made it more likely that patients would get a high-grade prostate cancer, which grows and spreads more quickly.

"This risk appears to be low, but healthcare professionals should be aware of this safety information, and weigh the known benefits against the potential risks when deciding to start or continue treatment with 5-ARIs in men," the FDA said on its website.

5-ARI drugs are known clinically as finasteride and dutasteride and are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), or prostate enlargement, a common condition in men over 40. Propecia, for male baldness, includes a smaller dose of finasteride.

The FDA said about 5 million male patients were given a prescription for a 5-ARI from 2002 to 2009. The drugs' benefits in treating BPH still outweighed any risks, it said.

Another class of medicines known as alpha-blockers can also be used to treat symptoms of BPH. Drugs of this type include Astellas Pharma's Flomax, Pfizer Inc's Cardura, and Rapaflo from Watson Pharmaceuticals.

(Reporting by Anna Yukhananov; editing by John Wallace)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Humanism wrote:
I think anyone who is personally involved should carefully review the relevant data, what the FDA specifically said and understand the interpretive semantics of an article presented by Reuters. Aggressive cancer cells with or without finasteride and dutasteride always grow and spread more rapidly. Aggressive forms of cancer must be treated aggressively and not rely on drugs or treatments that are ultimately a patients form of panacea. The bigger problem is applying aggressive forms of cancer treatment to slow growing, intermediate and low grade, cancer cells. My point is if you assume responsibility of your cancer treatment then understand the pathology of cancer cells and the pharmacology of drugs to treat cancer.

Jun 09, 2011 7:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.