Berlusconi suffers stinging referendum defeat

ROME Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:26pm EDT

Italy's Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi gestures during a news conference with his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu (not pictured) at Villa Madama in Rome June 13, 2011. REUTERS/Stefano Rellandini

Italy's Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi gestures during a news conference with his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu (not pictured) at Villa Madama in Rome June 13, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Stefano Rellandini

Related Topics

ROME (Reuters) - Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi suffered a humiliating defeat on Monday as Italians turned out in large numbers to vote in referendums which he had encouraged them to boycott.

The proposals to repeal Berlusconi-era legislation on nuclear power, water privatization and trial immunity for government ministers were backed by opposition parties and opposed by the center-right.

Interior Ministry figures put the turnout at 57 percent, a huge change from the lackluster participation in previous referendums, and 95 percent of the votes counted backed the motions.

Berlusconi, still reeling from crushing local election defeats last month, had declared that he would not cast a vote, but the unusually high turnout dashed any hope he may have had that the necessary quorum of 50 percent would not be reached.

He said in a statement that the government would accept the "clear" result of the vote.

"The government and parliament now have the duty to fully accept the result of the four referendums," he said.

Berlusconi said the vote had probably ended any prospect of using atomic energy in Italy.

The referendums needed a turnout of more than 50 percent to be valid and met the target easily. Supporters of the proposals had been considered far more likely than opponents to vote.

The referendums could not have come at a worse time for the 74-year-old premier, who faces a sex scandal and three fraud trials and was weakened by crushing losses in last month's local elections, including in his northern power base, Milan.

The center-left opposition campaigned hard to get voters to the polling stations. The last referendum to reach a quorum was in 1995. Six have been declared void since then.

Pierluigi Bersani, leader of the center-left Democratic Party, said it had been "an extraordinary day" and repeated a call for Berlusconi to resign.

"SLAP IN THE FACE"

More ominously for the ruling center-right, Berlusconi's coalition allies in the Northern League appeared to be losing patience after weeks of acrimony, raising the possibility of a split that could cost the government its majority.

"In the local elections two weeks ago we had a slap in the face, now with this referendum we've had the second slap in the face and I don't want this to become a habit," said Roberto Calderoli, one of the League's senior ministers.

A stagnant economy, one of the world's highest levels of public debt and 30 percent youth unemployment are among the problems facing a government riven by divisions over issues ranging from tax to the NATO campaign in Libya.

Economy Minister Giulio Tremonti, widely credited with shielding Italy from the financial market crisis, has insisted on rigid budget discipline but faces growing opposition from cabinet colleagues alarmed that the policy is electoral poison.

A confidence vote in parliament on June 22, intended to test the government's majority after a reshuffle last month, will be the next marker of whether Berlusconi has the support to see out his term until its scheduled end in 2013.

"Berlusconi has to show he is brave and launch an ambitious program for the next two years. He should do it now, on June 22 in parliament," Interior Minister Roberto Maroni, another top Northern League leader, told the Corriere della Sera daily.

With speculation growing that cabinet divisions may bring down the government before the 2013 elections, the referendum provided a sharp snapshot of the electorate's mood.

Berlusconi has been a major supporter of atomic power, which the center right says is indispensable for the future of a country that imports nearly all its energy.

Aware of the likely backlash after the disaster at Japan's Fukushima reactor in March, the government had suspended its nuclear plans but a referendum could block them for decades.

One referendum repealed the "legitimate impediment" that allows ministers to skip trial hearings against them if they are on government business, which Berlusconi's critics say is for his personal benefit by possibly delaying his four concurrent trials.

Two others concerned the privatization of water utilities. The government says privatization is essential to finance better services while opponents say it would lead to higher prices.

(Writing by James Mackenzie and Philip Pullella; editing by Barry Moody and Tim Pearce)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
aligatorhardt wrote:
Privatization of water supplies is wrong on moral grounds and no privatization of public services ever leads to better services and usually leads to higher prices as profit margins and executive pay is added to the cost of doing business. The privatization raises funds in the short term so it offsets harms until the next administration has to deal with the issue.
Nuclear power is harmful to the population and has the unique potential to permanently destroy the value of property and health. It takes cesium 137 over 200 years to decay to background levels. This is not a risk that can be justified by convenience. The length of time involved in bringing nuclear power facilities online is around ten years, during that time we could have much more capacity of renewable energy installed, which provides jobs, improved health, better economic advantages from lack of fuel bills, and reduced foreign purchases. The carbon and other pollution saved by renewable energy is another advantage.

Jun 13, 2011 8:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus