Malpractice claims common outside of the hospital

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:23pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Medical errors don't just happen at the hospital, according to a new study that highlights safety problems in the doctor's office as well.

Researchers found that about half of U.S. malpractice payments -- a proxy for medical errors -- from 2009 involved patients seen outside of the hospital.

Previous studies have focused mostly on the situation inside hospitals, some of which now have checklists and other systems in place to help prevent devastating mistakes.

But "invasive and high-technology diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are increasingly being performed in the outpatient setting," the researchers note, so they decided to compare the number and seriousness of adverse events in inpatient and outpatient settings, as reflected by malpractice claims.

A 1999 report from the Institute of Medicine suggested as many as 98,000 Americans die from preventable medical errors every year, costing society billions of dollars, and consumer advocates say little has changed since then.

That the number of malpractice claims would be virtually the same for hospitals and doctors' offices was unexpected, Dr. Tara Bishop, who worked on the study, told Reuters Health.

"We were actually very surprised by that finding," Bishop, of Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, said. "I hope it's a wake-up call for the medical community and for patients, so we can start working on ways to solve these problems."

The researchers analyzed malpractice claim payments from the National Practitioner Data Bank from 2005 to 2009. Overall, the number of payments dropped slightly for patients treated both inside and outside of the hospital.

In 2009, the last year of the study, there were 4,910 payments due to inpatient errors, 4,448 due to outpatient errors, and 966 involving both settings. Together, these payments were worth more than $3.3 billion.

"These weren't trivial errors -- death and major injuries were the most common reason for malpractice claims," said Bishop. "It's nice to see this trend coming down, but we still don't know if it's due to better patient safety."

According to the new report, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, there are 30 times as many outpatient visits as hospital discharges every year.

Bishop said the most common errors were different across the two settings, with surgical mistakes dominating the claims for hospitalized patients and misdiagnosis being the biggest problem at the doctor's office.

That means fixing the problems outside hospitals will take separate efforts, such as training doctors to communicate better with patients.

In a related editorial, Dr. Gianna Zuccotti and Dr. Luke Sato of the Harvard Medical Institutions in Boston say malpractice claims represent only the tip of the iceberg for medical errors.

They note that the decrease in claim payments over the study period -- by more than 2,500 -- is good news.

The bad news, they add, is that rigorous, effective programs for controlling the risk of errors outside the hospital don't exist right now.

According to Bishop, patients can also help lower the chance that their doctor will make a mistake by learning about the tests and medications they get, and keeping their doctor up to speed about what's happened between visits.

"I do hope that patients will realize that it's important to take control of what happens in their healthcare," Bishop said.

SOURCE: bit.ly/4HWZ7 Journal of the American Association of Medicine, online June 14, 2011.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
sabrina12 wrote:
Interesting Article, however you failed to address the root cause of Malpractice cases. Lawyers and the greedy patients who feel this is one easy pay day. The majority of Malpractice cases are settled before they reach trail. The reason is simple, Litigation is so much more expense then settling so the doctors choose to settle regardless. In the Majority, A poor outcome does not prove that the medical professional did anything wrong, yet the legal system is such that innocent doctors are hurt and their Malpractice rates increased based upon a wrong jury verdict. The majority of malpractice cases are decided by Juries with NO medical experience. They will sometimes provide a guilt verdict so the patient can receive a cash award when they know the doctor was innocent. In a case that I was present previously, a Jury awarded a woman $850,000.00 was no real guilt was established. The lawyer Put on such a good show, that the jurors were clearly moved and the doctors mouth hit the floor. As an observer I was shocked. In the end the Judge struck down the award verdict to $475,000.00. The judge stated that the verdict was extreme. yes, I know there are some real cases of Medical Injuries that need addressing. But the current system is a lotto for the lawyers and in the end, the patient really does not get the loin share.

Jun 14, 2011 6:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
LindaJoyAdams wrote:
Warning: You know medical problems may occur if:1. ever had a liability claim ( workers comp, car accident, etc which means info on insurance national data base;a govt contractor maintains not under HIPPAA and no corrections can be made and you can’t get a copy)l. doctor takes no medical history nor has you sign a release to contact your family or other doctors. national data base is being used?( happened to me with a specialist)and started bleeding out from a prescribed medicine due to diagnosis altered on the data base to ‘ hide’ severity’ of injuries on a Federal workers comp case. another time denied treatment at AN ER when I was suffering from super bug infection that had caused pressure on optic nerve. The HIPPAA law only pertains to your medical providers- once a claim is filed with private or govt health plan( under the control of govt contractors0 no protections exist. Doctors need to use extra caution in relying on a fraudulent, altered chaotic mess. It was a good idea, but with no oversight to assure accuracy, its become a ‘ death panel’ tool according to a congressional study done over 3 years ago on wrongful death malpractice suits. Linda Joy Adams

Jun 16, 2011 12:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jrj90620 wrote:
sabrina12 makes some great points.I know,from personal experience,that most jurors are not qualified to be making these decisions.They are swayed by the best talking lawyer.Would be better if we had professional jurors that wouldn’t be swayed by lies and deceit of lawyers.Loser pay would be a good thing.

Jun 16, 2011 12:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.