House Republican leader Boehner warns Obama over Libya

WASHINGTON Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:53pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - House Speaker John Boehner warned President Barack Obama on Tuesday that he was skating on thin legal ice by keeping U.S. forces involved in Libya for nearly three months without the authorization of Congress.

The letter from the Republican leader of the House of Representatives to the Democratic president threatened to turn lawmakers' unease over the Libyan conflict into a clash between Congress and the White House over constitutional powers.

Boehner accused Obama of "a refusal to acknowledge and respect the role of Congress" in military operations and a "lack of clarity" about why the U.S. was still involved in Libya.

He asked Obama to explain the legal grounds for the war by Friday, adding that by Sunday Obama would be in violation of the 1973 War Powers Resolution if nothing changed.

The Constitution says that Congress declares war, while the president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The War Powers Resolution sought to resolve the tensions in these roles and was passed by Congress over a veto by President Richard Nixon.

No sitting president has ever recognized the resolution, which prohibits U.S. armed forces from being involved in military actions for more than 60 days without congressional authorization, and includes a further 30-day withdrawal period. Boehner said the 90 days expires on Sunday.

"It would appear that in five days, the administration will be in violation of the War Powers Resolution unless it asks for and receives authorization from Congress or withdraws all U.S. troops and resources from the mission," Boehner said in the letter, which was released by his office.

"Have you ... conducted the legal analysis to justify your position?" he asked. "Given the gravity of the constitutional and statutory questions involved, I request your answer by Friday, June 17, 2011."


Obama notified Congress in March that the United States was taking part in a multinational operation conducting air strikes to protect Libyan civilians from by Muammar Gaddafi's forces. Obama did not ask for congressional authorization.

There are no U.S. troops on the ground in Libya, where NATO is leading the intervention with the United States providing logistical support and intelligence.

The White House says it has consulted regularly with lawmakers on the war and officials have suggested that the limited U.S. action might not meet the War Powers threshold.

White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said administration officials have testified at more than 10 hearings on Capitol Hill, which included substantial discussion of Libya. Officials also took part in more than 30 briefings with lawmakers and staff and would keep engaging with Congress, he said.

"We are in the final stages of preparing extensive information for the House and Senate that will address a whole host of issues about our ongoing efforts in Libya, including those raised in the House resolution as well as our legal analysis with regard to the War Powers Resolution," Vietor said.

If Obama did ask for congressional authorization, it is not clear he would get it. The Democratic-controlled Senate has not tried to pass a non-binding resolution supporting the war.

Two House lawmakers, Democrat Dennis Kucinich and Republican Walter Jones, said they would file a lawsuit in federal court concerning Obama and the Libyan war.

Earlier this month, a House majority passed a resolution accusing Obama of not having offered a "compelling rationale" for the Libyan war and demanding information about its costs and scope by Thursday June 16. Boehner's letter indicated that lawmakers are still waiting for answers.

That resolution noted that Congress has the authority to cut off funds for military operations, implying this might be considered if the Obama administration did not respond.

(Additional reporting by Laura MacInnis; Editing by Cynthia Osterman and Christopher Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (15)
Maggy519 wrote:
Remember when Gadaffi started shooting protesters and the GOP was yelling at Obama to do something NOW! Well, he got the NATO operation together and they did something. He said there would be no ground troops. This whole thing would have been over by now if the congress just would have supported the President and left their politics at the “waters edge.” Gadaffi wrote a letter to THANK Boehner last week for criticizing the President for God’s sake. Good work media in reporting this BTW.
Why do people support the GOP? WHEN will the media hold them accountable for their contemptuous behavior?

Jun 14, 2011 7:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ginchinchili wrote:
There are many things that the GOP do that al Qaeda would love to be able to do to the US themselves.

A current ongoing example is the GOP’s threat not to raise the debt limit. Follow through on that, watch the US credit rating get lowered, and then watch us slip back into a recession, one which we might not be able to get out of for a very long time. In fact, it would put the entire world economy at risk. Destroying the economies of the west is one of al Qaeda’s top priorities, especially the US economy.

It would also give China and others a good argument for replacing the US dollar as the international currency with something else, and a whole host of other things that would be detrimental to the US, like making sure Americans don’t get adequate healthcare or education.

The media doesn’t hold the Republicans accountable for what they do because the media is owned by corporations and the last thing corporations want is for the US public to know the whole truth about what is going on and about how America doesn’t really have a democracy anymore. We have a plutocracy.

Jun 14, 2011 7:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
TheNewWorld wrote:

I don’t recall the either party screaming for us to get into Libya. Obama has been the only person to take action to get us in there. Democrats and Republicans in Congress have both criticized him for not doing it constitutionally. Obama is wrong here, both sides of the aisle agree on that.

Jun 14, 2011 7:56pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.