U.S. advisers back Regeneron eye drug

COLLEGE PARK, Maryland Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:33pm EDT

Related Topics


Ebola epidemic

Quarantines and isolation units imposed to stop the spread of the worst Ebola outbreak in history.  Slideshow 

COLLEGE PARK, Maryland (Reuters) - A new eye medicine from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer AG is safe and effective for treating a common cause of vision loss, a panel of U.S. experts said on Friday.

The Food and Drug Administration advisory panel voted unanimously to recommend Eylea as a treatment for the most serious form of macular degeneration that affects at least 1.5 million Americans.

The advisers also said the injected drug could be given once every two months, giving it an edge over the typical monthly dosing of its chief competitor, Lucentis, from Roche Holding AG.

"The data is very compelling for equivalence (with Lucentis)," said Dr. Lynn Gordon, a panel member and associate professor at the University of California in Los Angeles.

The FDA usually follows the advice of its advisory panels and is expected to rule on Eylea by August 20.

Regeneron shares, halted much of Friday pending the advisory panel decision, lost 4.8 percent on Nasdaq to close at $54.02.

Jason Kantor of RBC Capital Markets said Regeneron's share price had reflected an expected favorable opinion, so the decline was likely a case of "selling on the news."

Kantor predicted the drug would fare well, but said the main reason to own Regeneron is its array of antibodies being developed for other diseases in partnership with French drugmaker Sanofi SA.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in the elderly, with the wet form the most serious. Some 11 million Americans have signs of AMD.

Piper Jaffray analyst Edward Tenthoff sees Regeneron taking 25 percent of the U.S. market by 2016, with annual sales of $1.2 billion.


Eylea and Lucentis could face competition from Roche's cancer drug Avastin, a much less expensive medicine that is often used by doctors to treat macular degeneration even though it has not been approved by the FDA for that purpose.

The amount of Avastin needed for an eye injection costs only around $50, against a U.S. price of $1,950 for Lucentis and probably a similar price for Eylea. All three drugs work in a similar way.

An April study showed Avastin was as effective as Lucentis, though it had more side effects.

Eylea's advantage over both rivals may be its two-month dosing.

In clinical trials, Regeneron showed that Eylea injected into the eye every two months was as effective as monthly doses of Lucentis. The committee said monthly monitoring of patients receiving Eylea was not necessary.

"I think many of my patients are looking for something they can take less often, and that's the exciting possibility of Eylea," said Dr. Jeffrey Heier, a clinical instructor of ophthalmology at Harvard Medical School who spoke on behalf of Regeneron.

Regeneron has full marketing rights to the drug in the United States and would share overseas profits equally with Germany's Bayer if Eylea wins regulatory approval in other countries.

"It's a particularly proud day for us because few companies can go from the discovery of the molecule and take it to this point," said Regeneron Chief Executive Officer Leonard Schleifer.

"We started out as good scientists and hopefully we can become good manufacturers too."

(Additional reporting by Ransdell Pierson and Lisa Richwine; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick and Tim Dobbyn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
boilerdaveb wrote:
I can’t imagine this means a whole great deal assuming Regeneron costs are similar to Lucentis. I would still prefer the much more cost friendly Avastin for my patients, assuming similar results.

Jun 17, 2011 6:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Karissa wrote:
In the article, U.S. ADVISORS BACK REGENERON EYE DRUG, By Anna Yukhananov, COLLEGE PARK, Maryland | Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:33pm EDT, it was written, “An April study showed Avastin was as effective as Lucentis, though it had more side effects.”
I have been keeping up with Avastin & Lucentis/Avastin vs Lucentis studies for the last 2 years & this is the first time I’ve heard of Avastin “[having] more side effects.”
Please see this link… http://www.retinaeyedoctor.com/2011/05/avastin-and-lucentis-are-equally-safe-too/

Jun 18, 2011 6:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.