".brands" approach with Internet name shake-up

LONDON Fri Jun 17, 2011 12:39pm EDT

Customers look over Apple products at the company's retail store in San Francisco, California April 22, 2009. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith

Customers look over Apple products at the company's retail store in San Francisco, California April 22, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith

LONDON (Reuters) - Brand owners will soon be able to operate their own parts of the Web -- such as .apple, .coke or .marlboro -- if the biggest shake-up yet in how Internet domains are awarded is approved.

After years of preparation and wrangling, ICANN, the body that coordinates Internet names, is expected to approve the move at a special board meeting in Singapore on Monday.

Today, just 22 generic top-level domains (gTLDs) exist -- .com, .org and .info are a few examples -- plus about 250 country-level domains like .uk or .cn. After the change, several hundred new gTLDs are expected to come into existence.

The move is seen as a big opportunity for brands to gain more control over their online presence and send visitors more directly to parts of their sites -- and a danger for those who fail to take advantage.

It will also change the way search engines like Google find results, and the way organizations use search-engine optimization to improve the visibility of their websites in search results.

"As a big brand, you ignore it at your peril," says Theo Hnarakis, chief executive of Australian domain name-registration firm Melbourne IT DBS, which advises companies and other organizations worldwide about how to do business online.

"We're advising people to buy their brands, park them and redirect visitors to their existing site, at the very least," says Hnarakis, whose more than 3,500 customers include Volvo, Lego and GlaxoSmithKline.

If the change is approved on Monday, applications are likely to open in January for a 90-day period before closing again, potentially for years.

It will cost $185,000 to apply, and individuals or organizations will have to show a legitimate claim to the name they are buying. ICANN is taking on hundreds of consultants to whom it will outsource the job of adjudicating claims.

"The commercial participants are the most active, aggressive and articulate members of our society," ICANN CEO Rod Beckstrom told Reuters in a recent interview, saying trademark owners in particular were anxious about how the new regime would work.

As well as big brands, organizations such as cities or other communities are expected to apply.

GTLDs such as .nyc, .london or .food could provide opportunities for many smaller businesses to grab names no longer available at the .com level -- like bicycles.london or indian.food.

The new domains will also change how ICANN works, as it will have a role in policing how gTLDs are operated, bought and sold. Until now, it has overseen names and performed some other tasks but has been little involved in the Internet's thornier issues.

To prevent so-called cyber-squatting, gTLD owners will be expected to maintain operational sites. ICANN will have to approve transfers to new owners at the top level.

(Editing by Andrew Callus)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Dashcom wrote:
Beyond “Dotcoms” and “Not-Coms” are “Dashcoms” (or playing the TLD Game Without Spending $185K plus potentially unlimited annual costs)

New Dashcoms (not Dotcoms) are highly memorable & relevant Domain Names such as “sports-com”, “jazz-music”, “paris-fashion” (you can even use some Facebook Emoticons to regsiter addresses like “♫♫-♫♫”).

Totally outside ICANN’s control, anyone can create any domain or TLD, in any language at no cost whatsoever.

With users in over 90 countries worldwide, resolution is via an APP; although new ISP links are coming online to make that unnecessary (ISP links that are also available to ICANN).

Jun 18, 2011 10:52am EDT  --  Report as abuse
GSH10 wrote:
Once all of the Fortune XXX companies have paid $185K, the price will come down to street level for the average small business. Perhaps ICANN will run an auction for common names.

Jun 18, 2011 3:34pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
rustre wrote:
Hmmmn … I really don’t see any value in this unless I am the one selling the domain rights to a poor sucker looking to give up $200K. I think the internet world needs this like they need another prince in Nigeria looking to move their fortune. I liken this to the monthly e-mail I get from China warning me that mycompany’sdomain.cn is about to fall into the hands of someone nefarious. I can’t believe anyone would fall for this – I certainly don’t think this helps the customer find us any easier – in fact it adds even more complexity for the typical customer (e.g., to learn about my soda pop, should I go to coke.com or product.coke?)

I think a slash is good enough for indexing. Do we really need a justforfeet.justforfeet?

The good news is that the companies applying must provide justification in order to obtain rights. Let’s all wait until the price drops to $10. Then let’s buy it and never use it.

Jun 20, 2011 3:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.