Rebecca Black's "Friday" video in legal battle

Related Topics

Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:17pm EDT

NEW YORK (Hollywood Reporter) - Rebecca Black is getting her 16th minute of fame now that the teen starlet's infamous "Friday" video has been pulled off YouTube by her lawyers.

The singer enjoyed tremendous viral success in March with a song that was so silly and simple ("Everybody's lookin' forward to the weekend, weekend"), it became irresistible fodder for every amateur comedian on Twitter and Facebook. The song reached No. 58 on Billboard's Hot 100 chart, was covered by Justin Bieber, and then jumped the shark when it was performed on "Glee."

Black's "Friday" then started its descent toward a future edition of "Trivial Pursuit," but now has gotten a momentary reprieve thanks to a take-down notice.

Unlike 99.9% of takedown notices submitted to YouTube, this isn't a garden-variety response to a user uploading unauthorized copyrighted material. Rather, the dispute has been going on for months and is more about the contracts that young musicians sign before they hit it big.

In Black's case, she seems to have created a vanity recording by making a deal with Ark Music Records to use its studio to record her song. After the song exploded, Ark Music wanted to capitalize. And that's when it starts to get interesting.

In March, Black's lawyers sent a letter to Ark Music, accusing the company of copyright infringement and unlawful exploitation of her publicity rights. Specifically, Black says she never got the master recordings allegedly due to her by contract and that Ark hadn't attained the necessary rights to advertise her as an exclusive Ark recording artist and commercially exploit the song in derivatives like ringtones.

Most bona fide record labels would have taken care of such matters rather easily. But if Ark was really more like a recording studio for hire rather than a recording label, it likely gave little thought to how it would support Black's career through publicity and marketing expenditures. Instead, Ark took a few hundred dollars from Black's mother to let the 13-year-old record a song, probably without the slightest expectation of any further reward.

Now that the song has hit it big, the equation has obviously changed, and the parties are fussing over who owns which rights, which will help determine the slicing of the royalty pie. If the parties don't come to an agreement, only a court's inspection of the contract will settle the matter.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
The article states “a few hundred dollars.” Ark Music factory charged Rebecca Black’s father $2,000 to make that video. That’s a good chunk of change for a teenager’s birthday present.

Jun 17, 2011 3:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
onbelay wrote:
Worst song ever.

Jun 17, 2011 4:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Stupidscript wrote:
Does “work for hire” mean what it used to mean? Is there anything that explicitly nullifies the “work for hire” that Ark was hired to do? If the answer to #1 is “yes”, and #2 is “no”, then Ark is SOL. They did the work for the Dad (or Mom, as I heard it), they released the rights to the master recording … that’s all she wrote.

(Actually, the reason Ark have NOT released the master recording, itself, is that possession of that tape/disc/file is a pretty heavy indicator of who actually owns the rights to it. Musicians have fought for generations to get their master recordings from the record companies when their contracts expire for just that reason. But if it’s in the deal the Parent signed when they contracted the “work for hire”, then they get it, and it’s deal done.)

Jun 17, 2011 4:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.