Romney stresses abortion opposition in editorial

Related Topics

Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney reacts during the first New Hampshire debate of the 2012 campaign at St. Anselms College in Manchester, New Hampshire June 13, 2011. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney reacts during the first New Hampshire debate of the 2012 campaign at St. Anselms College in Manchester, New Hampshire June 13, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

BOSTON | Sat Jun 18, 2011 2:58pm EDT

BOSTON (Reuters) - Republican White House hopeful Mitt Romney restated his support for a reversal of Roe vs Wade on Saturday after opting not to sign what he called an "overly broad" pledge promoted by an anti-abortion advocacy group.

"I am pro-life and believe that abortion should be limited to only instances of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother," the former Massachusetts governor wrote in an editorial on the conservative National Review's website.

The current front-runner for the 2012 Republican nomination was attempting to blunt criticism of his decision not to sign a pledge pushed by the Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion organization.

Those signing the list vow to nominate judges and appoint executive branch officials who are opposed to abortion.

Signing on have been Minnesota Congressman Michele Bachmann, former House speaker Newt Gingrich, Texas Congressman Ron Paul, former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty and former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum.

Romney, Georgia businessman Herman Cain and former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson opted not to sign.

"As much as I share the goals of the Susan B. Anthony List, its well-meaning pledge is overly broad and would have unintended consequences. That is why I could not sign it," Romney wrote.

Romney said it was one thing to end federal funding for a family planning organization like Planned Parenthood, but it was an entirely different matter to end all federal funding for thousands of hospitals across America.

"That is precisely what the pledge would demand and require of a president who signed it," he wrote.

Romney called the landmark pro-choice legislation Roe v. Wade "bad law and bad medicine," and said he supports the Hyde Amendment, which bars the use of federal funds for abortions.

Democrats charge that Romney has changed his views on abortion at least once. In 2002, while campaigning for governor in socially liberal Massachusetts, he vowed to "preserve and protect" a woman's right to have an abortion.

(Reporting by Ros Krasny; Editing by Anthony Boadle)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Huck_Finn wrote:
Romney is the best chance to get the American economy back to work again. He has the brains and the experience that nobody else in the field comes close to matching.

We need Romney in the WH. The economy needs Romney in the WH.

It’s time for the party, and the country, to come together to get us back on our feet. Romney gives us the best chance of doing that!

Jun 18, 2011 3:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Eliza28 wrote:
This is lazy reporting/writing.

The group referred to is not “anti-abortion” and the pledge iss not about appointing officials and nominating judges who are “opposed to abortion.”

The group wants judges and officials who are opposed to abortion’s being LEGAL, which is something completely different.

One can be “opposed to abortion” but not think it should be criminalized. Outlawing abortion will not end the practice, it will just make it unsafe.

Also, those calling themselves “anti-abortion” are often anti-birth control and sex education as well. Planned Parenthood probably prevents more abortions than any “anti-abortion” group.

Jun 18, 2011 3:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Dankur wrote:
Romney is not a doctor. What he is proposing is defunding organizations like Planned Parenthood who spend 97% of their resources providing prenatal care, contraception, and women’s health. The 3% of care dedicated to abortions is not even money provided by either the state or the federal government. What he needs to propose are plans to decrease the need for abortions. This would entail programs (church, school, primary care, Planned Parenthood) to provide contraception or true sex ed for the population that is most susceptible to unwanted pregnancies – the young and poor.

Jun 18, 2011 4:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.