Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Same-sex marriage goes down to legislative wire in New York

Related Topics

Men dressed in tuxedo jackets to emulate grooms at a wedding wave flags touting their 30 years in a relationship together as a form of support for gay marriage, in the annual Gay Pride Parade in New York June 28, 2009. REUTERS/Jacob Silberberg

Men dressed in tuxedo jackets to emulate grooms at a wedding wave flags touting their 30 years in a relationship together as a form of support for gay marriage, in the annual Gay Pride Parade in New York June 28, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Jacob Silberberg

NEW YORK | Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:27am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Supporters and opponents of gay marriage made 11th-hour appeals on Sunday as state lawmakers weighed a vote on making New York the sixth state -- and the most populous -- to legalize same-sex marriage.

The measure that would make gay marriage legal, introduced by Governor Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat and strong advocate, is currently one vote shy of passage in the state Senate.

The state Assembly approved the bill by a wide margin last week, and Monday is the last day of the legislative session before summer recess.

New York's Archbishop, Timothy Dolan, reiterated his and the Catholic Church's opposition to gay marriage on Sunday, vowing to oppose "any radical bill to redefine the very essence of marriage."

"One has to wonder why the proponents of this radical redefinition, who claim overwhelming popular support, would not consider" a referendum "on such a drastic departure from traditional values?" he wrote on his blog.

Recent polls show statewide support for gay marriage.

Dolan wrote that the "government presumes to redefine" such sacred words as father, mother, husband and wife "at the peril of the common good."

In Albany, Senate Majority Leader Republican Dean Skelos has said the bill as written has prompted concerns over its religious clauses and exemptions.

The bill does not compel any member of the clergy to conduct same-sex marriages, but some Republican lawmakers are concerned the legal protection is not strong enough.

Skelos said Cuomo has indicated he was open to including more specific exemptions for religious groups.

The governor has lobbied for passage and said he remains cautiously optimistic the bill will come to a vote and pass.

Meanwhile gay marriage advocates, including Latinos United for Marriage Equality, rallied on Sunday.

"Our demand today is simple and reasonable: bring Marriage Equality to a vote on Monday," said Jake Goodman of the group Queer Rising, in a statement.

The group held a "Last Day of Marriage Inequality" rally in Manhattan's Union Square, where supporters carried signs that read "'I do'" support marriage equality" and "Be a leader: introduce the bill."

New Yorkers United for Marriage also held rallies around the state.

The stakes are especially high because New York would become the most populous U.S. state to allow gay marriage approved by lawmakers, spelling a huge gay rights victory.

The state-by-state battle over gay marriage has become a contentious U.S. social issue ahead of the 2012 presidential and congressional elections.

Five states -- Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, New Hampshire and Vermont -- and the District of Columbia allow gay marriage, while four states have civil unions. Gay marriage is specifically banned in 39 states.

(Reporting by Chris Michaud; editing by Ellen Wulfhorst.)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
mikemm wrote:
Th GOP who controls the state senate wants to play both sides on this courting support from both moderates and right wingers. The members from the more progressive districts are on the record as for it, but probably at the same time assurin gto their peers and conservative base that it will never actually come to a vote anyway. I expect this to be pushed out to after the summer break and then be deprioritized after that so it never gets to an actual floor vote and dies there for this legislative year. And, expect the same tactics for the 2012 election year.

The GOP line on marriage equallity in NY is they will support same sex marriage, but want to exempt anyone (they claim religous organizations, but they really also mean individuals with religious reservations) from discrimination lawsuits for refusing to participate in any aspect of same sex ceremonies. This is a bad precedent. Equal rights, but no real protections from discrimination. Since the GOP knows that any real challenge to this will find those “protections” unconstitutional, they really don’t want it to ever pass as law.

Jun 20, 2011 11:39am EDT  --  Report as abuse
mikemm wrote:
The staunch objection by the Catholic Church to this in NY is totally hippocritical. First, they object strongly to Cuomo not being married saying that sex should only be in marriage, but limit that restriction to heterosexuals. Secondly, prevelance of homosexuality to some degree in the Catholic Churh is a dirty secret that everybody already knows. Third, where was the church morally for those decades when hundreds of cases of child molestation occurred within their ranks and they chose to defend the perpetrators instead of the innocent victims?

Jun 20, 2011 11:48am EDT  --  Report as abuse
seattlesh wrote:
Governments need to get out of the marriage business and move toward a universal system of registered domestic partnerships in order to afford legal protections and responsibilities of he partners. Organizations and churches would then be free to conduct marriage ceremonies as they see fit but the “married couple” would still be required to register as a domestic partnership.

Jun 20, 2011 12:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.