Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

House to vote on bill cutting funds for Libya

Related Topics

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addresses the media during a news conference after the third contact group meeting on Libya, at the Emirates Palace in Abu Dhabi June 9, 2011. REUTERS/Jumana El Heloueh

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addresses the media during a news conference after the third contact group meeting on Libya, at the Emirates Palace in Abu Dhabi June 9, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jumana El Heloueh

WASHINGTON | Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:28am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The House of Representatives is expected to vote this week on a proposal to cut off funds for U.S. military hostilities in Libya, lawmakers in the Republican majority said on Wednesday.

The measure, which is still being drafted, would ban funding for U.S. participation in combat missions such as drone attacks in the NATO-led air war, said Representative Howard McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

"It would not have funding for hostilities. The drones couldn't be used for bombing," McKeon told reporters.

A vote is likely on Friday. It is unclear if the measure can pass and Senate approval is unlikely. But criticism has been building in Congress, especially in the Republican-led House, of U.S. involvement in the Libya campaign and President Barack Obama's refusal to ask Congress for its consent.

The House measure would allow U.S. funding to continue until October 1 for "non-hostile' actions such as search and rescue, aerial refueling, operational planning, and intelligence, Republican aides said.

They said the intent was to let Washington maintain support for the NATO-led operation, while stopping further U.S. involvement in combat missions in Libya.

NATO is leading the effort to protect Libyan civilians from Muammar Gaddafi's forces -- a mission whose unstated goal seems to be to drive the Libyan leader from power -- with the United States providing logistical support and intelligence.

In the Democratic-led Senate, a bipartisan measure authorizing the U.S. military intervention in Libya was introduced this week by Democrat John Kerry and Republican John McCain

The House is also expected to vote this week on a measure basically the same as the Kerry-McCain proposal. Republican aides do not expect that measure to pass the House.

The decision to vote on cutting off funds came after several House Republicans told a closed-door party meeting on Wednesday they wanted to vote on something stronger than a non-binding reprimand of Obama.

"We're kind of cash-strapped in our country right now and the last thing we need to do is be engaged in another combat theater of operations," Republican Representative Allen West told reporters.

(Additional reporting by Richard Cowan; Editing by Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (22)
mark5610 wrote:
While you’re at it cut all funding to the White House.

Jun 23, 2011 7:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Yeeeech wrote:
Hilary, Amb. Rice and Samatha Powers-Sunstein great international adventure ends. Which is good, these three inexperienced self-important political appointees helped craft this mess, supporting a bunch of disorganized violent muslim terrorists with little taste or wish for democracy…..who are fighting a bunch of organized violent muslim terrorists who only wish to retain their power. This was a dumb scheme, and credit should be given where credit is due for this Billion dollar fiasco.

Jun 23, 2011 8:32am EDT  --  Report as abuse
mfm321 wrote:
Yeah!

Jun 23, 2011 8:42am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.