U.S. oil business, OPEC members slam crude release

WASHINGTON | Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:53pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. oil industry and major OPEC producers on Thursday slammed the international plan by crude consumers to release emergency petroleum reserves saying there is no supply emergency.

Industry group American Petroleum Institute said the Obama Administration's plan to release 30 million barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, as part of a 60 million barrel release coordinated with the International Energy Agency, was "ill-timed."

"The SPR was intended to be used for supply emergencies," said API spokesman Bill Bush. "There is no supply emergency."

The U.S. Energy Department said the loss of oil from Libya played into the decision to release the oil. But U.S. oil supplies are not low right now, despite oil prices trading recently at above $90 a barrel.

U.S. crude oil stockpiles last week were only 1.3 million barrels below the level last year, holding at 363.8 million barrels, U.S. Energy Information Administration, the statistics branch of the Energy Department, said on Wednesday.

OPEC delegates from Iran and two Gulf states said coordinated release by the United States and the 28-member IEA was unjustified.

"I don't know how to justify this interference in the market," a delegate told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

Iran, the current holder of the OPEC presidency, led opposition to a Saudi-led proposal to raise oil production at this month's OPEC meeting in Vienna.

The United States said Thursday it will work with the International Energy Agency to release a coordinated 60 million barrels of crude oil.

Gulf OPEC delegates, who had backed the Saudi proposal for higher output, also took issue with the plans to release oil.

"The oil price hasn't shot up to $150. There is no reason to do this. The market is not short of supply. Kuwait and Saudi Arabia have been raising production, but there have not been many buyers. The IEA is just playing politics with the U.S." one Gulf delegate told Reuters.

Energy stocks got hit after the IEA news. The S&P energy sector dropped 2.7 percent, while Chevron Corp fell 3.2 percent to $97.83 and was the biggest decliner on the Dow. Exxon Mobil Corp took off 2.9 percent at $77.51.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner, Ayesha Rascoe, and Amena Bakr in Riyadh; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Pundit wrote:
The pot calls the kettle black: OPEC and API – the biggest oil price manipulators – are complaining about government’s market intervention! How does it feel to be paid back in the same coin after years of market manipulation by directly controlling output, and through Wall Street hedging through collusion with Goldman Sachs traders? We haven’t forgotten the $140 barrel oil! For once, the Government has acted smartly to check greed and manipulation. Have a great night.

Jun 23, 2011 7:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
fromthecenter wrote:
Too funny… They are admitting there is no supply problem yet, the price has shot up like a bottle rocket on 4th of july. I noticed they were complaining about that?

Jun 23, 2011 8:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
justuhvoter wrote:
Will ANYONE who thinks 60 million barrels of oil will have any effect on the economy or oil prices in the long run, when we consume 18.9 million a DAY, please state your case. No one in the government can explain it either — other than its another B.S. news release by the administration in a run-up to the election.

Jun 23, 2011 12:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.