Casey Anthony murder trial nearing an end

Related Topics

1 of 4. An image projected on a courtroom monitor shows Cindy Anthony with her granddaughter Caylee, which was submitted as evidence in the Casey Anthony trial at the Orange County Courthouse in Orlando, June 24, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Red Huber/Pool

ORLANDO, Fla | Fri Jun 24, 2011 7:57pm EDT

ORLANDO, Fla (Reuters) - The end is in sight for the weeks-long first-degree murder trial of Casey Anthony, the young hard-partying Florida mother who garnered national attention in 2008 when she falsely claimed her 2-year-old daughter Caylee had been kidnapped by a nanny.

Judge Belvin Perry on Friday made plans for the jury to begin deliberations by the end of next week.

Defense attorneys spent the day once again attempting to punch holes in the state's evidence.

Prosecutors say 25-year-old Casey smothered Caylee with duct tape on June 16, 2008, drove around several days with the toddler's body in her car trunk and then dumped the remains in woods near the Anthony family home outside of Orlando.

Caylee was reported missing on July 15, 2008, by Casey's mother, who was frustrated by Casey's excuses for why she couldn't see her granddaughter.

Cindy Anthony said she became alarmed when she smelled a stench she likened to death in Casey's abandoned car.

Despite Casey's initial statement to detectives that Caylee was kidnapped, her defense team contends the child accidentally drowned in the family's backyard pool and the death went unreported.

Defense attorney Jose Baez suggested to the jury in his opening statement that Casey's father, George Anthony, had some role in the disposal of the body.

Yuri Melich, the lead detective in the case, acknowledged on Friday that he saw a television report showing George had used the same distinctive type of duct tape found on Caylee's skull to hang a missing persons poster at the search command center he ran with his wife.

Melich testified that he never followed up and asked George about the tape.

Melich also said he told searchers to ignore a tip in August 2008 from meter reader Roy Kronk about possible human remains in the woods. Melich said the tip was vague but seemed to identify a location that previously had been searched by a cadaver dog.

On December 11, 2008, following another tip from Kronk, Caylee's remains were found in those woods but in a slightly different area than the tip specified, Melich said.

Baez also called to the witness stand one of the first deputies to go to the Anthony home in response to Cindy's 911 call on July 15, 2008.

Deputy Ryan Eberlin acknowledged that he didn't notice a horrid odor of decomposition emanating from Casey's car, in contrast to what many other prosecution witnesses testified they smelled.

The deputy mentioned he had briefly handcuffed Casey that night, a statement that led to the jury finding out that Casey was accused of credit card fraud by her mother.

Baez hammered at his theory that the Anthony family was dysfunctional. Baez contends that Casey's seeming lack of remorse over her daughter's death is a result of being sexually abused by family members. George specifically denied any such abuse from the witness stand.

Casey's brother, Lee, described how the family denied Casey's obvious pregnancy until just before she gave birth.

Lee, called as a defense witness, said he noticed Casey was pregnant in early to mid-2005 when Casey exited the bathroom they shared at the Anthony family home.

"When I went in, she was coming out. I could see her mid-section and she was showing," Lee testified.

Lee said he remarked, "'Excuse me. What the hell is that?' She kinda just waved me off."

Lee said he confronted his mother within a day or two. Cindy previously has testified that she thought Casey was just putting on weight or experiencing some bloating.

Lee said the next time he saw clearly that Casey was pregnant was later in the year when she picked him up at the airport. Lee said Casey's belly was "far enough out to where I knew she was not just putting on weight."

Lee cried on the witness stand as he testified that "regrettably" he did not visit Casey in the hospital after she gave birth to Caylee in August 2005. Pressed by Baez to explain why, Lee said, "I was just angry at everyone in general, that they didn't want to include me or felt it important to tell me (about the pregnancy), especially since I had already asked."

Earlier in the morning, over state objections, Baez tried to ask Cindy whether she and George had experienced marital problems.

Judge Belvin Perry asked Baez how that line of questioning fit into the defense theory of the case involving accidental drowning and sexual abuse. After a long jury break and a lengthy meeting between attorneys and the judge at his bench, the issue was dropped.

(Editing by Colleen Jenkins and Greg McCune)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (22)
Fandango wrote:
How very sad that this warrior woman has been reduced to lying in court to save the sociopath she raised. Cindy Anthony lied through her teeth today and it was pathetic. What we saw on that stand was an accomplished liar trying to save the life of another accomplished liar. Nobody in their right mind can believe her but your heart still went out to her in her bid to save a miscreant daughter like Casey Anthony. I grieve for this warrior and her murdered granddaughter. George Anthony comes across as a coward and I do believe he molested his daughter but that does not excuse what Casey did to Caley.

Jun 23, 2011 8:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
r-turo wrote:
Casey, do yourself and everyone else a favor and just admit you messed up. You panicked and didn’t know what to do about your child drowning and instead of calling 9/11 for help, you made a poor choice and have therefore compounded your problem way more than you needed to. You’re screwed now, either way, and you deserve what you get.

Jun 23, 2011 11:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
texjacob wrote:
I always cringe when computer experts get involved in court. How is the jury supposed to understand all the nuances of browser history, javascript popups, tracking cookies, and search histories? Just because a URL or cookie is listed 84 times doesn’t mean it was actually accessed by a human looking at it 84 times. A page can be -visited- only once and generate dozens of hits in the cache or history. And honestly, given the way this kind of information is stored and retrieved, dates are all but meaningless.

Use of this kind of information by the prosecution is more than a little disingenuous, if only because the factual grounds for it are so tenuous. And there’s nothing for any defense team to do about this kind of evidence. It’s just a sucker-punch that serves only to mislead the jury (and the public).

Jun 24, 2011 11:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.