Winklevoss twins push another suit against Facebook

Related Topics

Cameron Winklevoss (L) and brother Tyler Winklevoss leave the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals after a hearing on a settlement dispute with Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg in San Francisco, California January 11, 2011. REUTERS/Stephen Lam

Cameron Winklevoss (L) and brother Tyler Winklevoss leave the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals after a hearing on a settlement dispute with Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg in San Francisco, California January 11, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Stephen Lam

Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:01pm EDT

(Reuters) - Olympic rowing twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss are pushing ahead with another suit against Facebook, a day after they decided not to appeal a U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding their $65 million settlement with Facebook and its founder Mark Zuckerberg.

In a status report filed on Thursday with the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts, the twins and their business partner, Divya Narendra, said they would move the court for discovery on whether Facebook "intentionally or inadvertently suppressed evidence" during settlement proceedings over claims that Zuckerberg stole their idea for a college social networking website.

The claim in the Massachusetts Court relates to documents and communications that would have thrown light on the exact relationship between the twins and Zuckerberg at the time of Facebook's founding and says that Facebook should have disclosed those documents during the original settlement discussions.

The original settlement was intended to resolve a feud over whether Zuckerberg stole the idea for what became the world's most popular social networking website from the Winklevosses, who like him had attended Harvard University. Their battle was dramatized in the 2010 film "The Social Network.

After agreeing to the cash-and-stock accord, the Winklevosses sought to undo it, saying it was fraudulent because Facebook hid information from them, and that they deserved more money.

Tyler Meade, counsel for the Winklevoss twins and Narendra, declined to comment.

In a statement, Facebook's outside counsel Neel Chatterjee said, "These are old and baseless allegations that have been considered and rejected previously by the courts."

(Reporting by Jochelle Mendonca in Bangalore; Editing by Phil Berlowitz)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
WillAlexRep wrote:
I thought you cats were done with this, man. Take the ‘hundreds of million of dollars in stock’ and keep it moving. For goodness’ sake.

Jun 24, 2011 2:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
SuzyQPA2010 wrote:
There’s now way these two would have ever done anything on this scale, they didn’t have the talent. So as far as I’m concerned they are just money grubbers….they grubbed some money for helping Zuckerburg with his idea – and I think they grubbed more than they should have.
Greedy anyone?

Jun 24, 2011 8:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Doodlemom wrote:
The twins are lucky they hooked up with Zuckerberg. He’s much smarter and had a vision that was so much bigger than theirs. Their idea would not have been worth the money they are trying to get from him. They should take their settlement & row their little boat away.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2010/10/12/facebook-ads-and-mark-zuckerbergs-strategy.html

Jun 24, 2011 9:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.