Ex-Citigroup VP pleads not guilty in fraud case

NEW YORK Mon Jun 27, 2011 6:04pm EDT

A Citibank sign on a bank branch in midtown Manhattan, New York, November 17, 2010. REUTERS/Mike Segar

A Citibank sign on a bank branch in midtown Manhattan, New York, November 17, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A former Citigroup Inc vice president charged with embezzling $19 million from the bank's accounts -- an alleged fraud that went undiscovered for more than a year and a half -- pleaded not guilty in Brooklyn federal court on Monday.

Gary Foster, 35, was arrested Sunday at John F. Kennedy International Airport after arriving from Bangkok, prosecutors said. Foster's attorney, Isabelle Kirshner, said he had been in Bangkok for travel, and that he returned when his family told him a warrant had been issued for his arrest.

Foster, who appeared before Magistrate Judge Ramon Reyes in a blue buttoned shirt and khaki pants, was released on $800,000 bail, which was secured in part with his parents' house in Teaneck, New Jersey. The bail package forced Foster to surrender his passport and prohibits him from traveling outside of New York and New Jersey.

Prosecutors allege that between May 2009 and December 2010, Foster transferred $19.2 million from Citigroup debt-adjustment and interest-expense accounts to his own personal bank account at J.P. Morgan Chase NA.

Foster put fake contract and deal account numbers in the wire-transfer instructions to make them seem like they were supporting an existing contract, before diverting them first into the bank's cash accounts and then into his own accounts in as many as eight separate transfers, prosecutors said.

"The defendant allegedly used his knowledge of bank operations to commit the ultimate inside job," said Loretta Lynch, Attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

CITI 'OUTRAGED'

The alleged fraud went unnoticed until a recent internal audit of Citigroup's treasury department. A Citigroup investigator immediately informed the authorities, according to an affidavit from Thomas D'Amico, a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

A representative for Citigroup said the bank was "outraged" by Foster's alleged actions.

"Citi informed law enforcement immediately upon discovery of the suspicious transactions and we are cooperating fully to ensure Mr. Foster is prosecuted to the full extent of the law," the bank said in a statement.

The $19 million is not a significant portion of the assets of a company the size of Citigroup, according to Sam Rosenfarb, a certified fraud examiner and public accountant with the New York accounting firm Marcum LLP.

Still, Rosenfarb said, it is unusual for so much money to have been stolen in such a short time, and for a single employee to be able to bypass the internal systems typical at a company like Citigroup, which require multiple individuals to sign off on large money transfers.

"I've never known an embezzlement of this magnitude," Rosenfarb said. "It's not a large amount of money in the scheme of payments, but for an embezzlement case, it's one of the largest I've ever seen."

Foster, who left Citigroup in January, faces up to 30 years in prison if convicted. According to his co-counsel, Brian Linder, he "is planning on fighting it."

No date has been set for the next hearing in the case.

(Reporting by Jessica Dye; editing by Gunna Dickson, Bernard Orr)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
What’s really gross is that top bank executives are manipulating the system to legally enrich themselves with hundreds of times what this alleged two bit crook stole from Citigroup.

It’s well and good to prosecute employees who steal from their employers, but the system is so out of control that comparatively speaking, people stealing from the office supply cabinet are going to prison while people masterminding technically legal methods of milking companies of billions spend their days on the golf course (where they’re “working,” of course).

Jun 27, 2011 1:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
luiscatan wrote:
Why is the bank angry at him? Stealing and cheating is the standard practice of banks, though they have not yet been properly prosecuted for the last crisis they engendered!

Jun 27, 2011 10:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.