Beebe first Arkansas governor to speak to gay group

LITTLE ROCK, Ark Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:18pm EDT

Related Topics

LITTLE ROCK, Ark (Reuters) - Arkansas Democratic Governor Mike Beebe on Tuesday night became the first sitting governor of the state to speak to a gay rights group.

Beebe, who won his second term in 2010, addressed the Stonewall Democrats in a packed church hall of more than 200 people.

In the past, Beebe and the gay community have not agreed on many issues, including adoption rights and gay marriage, and the same was true on Tuesday night.

During a question and answer session, Beebe said an Arkansas newspaper should not have to run the name of a life partner in an obituary if that was the paper's policy. Many in the crowd loudly disagreed, as they did when Beebe said he didn't believe in gay marriage.

"I think marriage is ... as defined by the law," he said, saying unions should be between a man and a woman.

"That's something we disagree on," he said.

When asked if he thought marriage or civil union laws would ever become legal in Bible Belt Arkansas, Beebe said no.

But his appearance echoes other changes in the state, said Kathy Webb, the state's only openly gay legislator.

"Even if you look at the polls, a majority of Arkansans support the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell," said Webb, a founder of the Stonewall Democrats.

"Four years ago, you wouldn't have even seen that. I think more and more people are coming out of the closet, so to speak, and we are started to see change here."

Beebe told the group his opinions had changed over the years.

In 2006, he was opposed to gays becoming foster parents. When the issue re-emerged in 2008, Beebe changed his viewpoint and said there should not be a blanket provision. The determining factor, he said, should be in the best interest of the child.

(Editing by Jerry Norton)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
david0296 wrote:
“I think marriage is … as defined by the law,” he said, saying unions should be between a man and a woman.”

The law? The Constitution is our governing law, and it says that citizens are entitled to equal treatment. There has to be a “compelling” government interest in discriminating against a group of citizens. Preventing gay couples from marrying each other serves no government interest, and obviously does not “promote” responsible procreation for straight couples. (The so-called basis for DOMA) Moral and religious disapproval of gay people is not a rational basis to discriminate against them.

Jun 29, 2011 11:10am EDT  --  Report as abuse
rextrek wrote:
Id never go too nor spend my money in such a backwards – bigoted hate state anyways….as far as Im concerned – Arkansas doesn’t exist.

Jun 29, 2011 11:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.