A handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA on May 22,2013, show detained men, blindfolded and handcuffed, described by SANA as "terrorists fighters", a term commonly used to describe rebels fighting to topple President Bashar al-Assad, in Qusair, near Homs.    SANA/Handout via Reuters

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Arming rebels doesn't violate U.N. sanctions: France

NEW YORK | Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:20pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - France's decision to airlift weapons to Libyan rebels does not violate the U.N. arms embargo imposed on Libya in February, French Ambassador to the United Nations Gerard Araud said on Wednesday.

"We decided to provide self-defensive weapons to the civilian populations because we consider that these populations were under threat," Araud told reporters.

France said earlier on Wednesday that it dropped weapons to Libya's rebels this month, the first time that a NATO country bombing Libya has openly acknowledged arming rebels seeking to topple Muammar Gaddafi.

Paragraphs 9 and 10 of U.N. Security Council resolution 1970 from February imposed a comprehensive arms embargo on Libya. But resolution 1973, which was adopted in March and authorized military action against Libya, included language that some countries argue created a loophole in the embargo.

"In exceptional circumstances, we can not implement paragraph 9 when it's for protecting civilians," Araud said.

Resolution 1973 authorized U.N. member states "to take all necessary measures" to protect civilians in Libya. It also adds "notwithstanding paragraph 9 of resolution 1970" -- referring to the arms embargo.

U.S. and European officials have argued that the word "notwithstanding" is a loophole that could allow them to arm the rebels in the interest of protecting civilians. Araud made clear Paris subscribed to that view.

Council diplomats say that Russia, China and India, however, are among the council members who disagree with the idea of arming the rebels and are convinced that it is a breach of the arms embargo.

Western diplomats say that the language in resolution 1973 on the arms embargo is ambiguous and open to interpretation. But they also acknowledge that the majority of the 15 Security Council members believe that all arms transfers to Libya violate the spirit, if not the letter, of the arms embargo.

They said that Russia will undoubtedly soon register its disagreement with France's decision to arm the rebels, who a top U.N. official said earlier this week are gaining the upper hand in their fight against forces loyal to Gaddafi.

Analysts and U.N. diplomats warn that a decision by Western powers to exploit loopholes in, or secretly circumvent, a sanctions regime they themselves engineered could create an atmosphere of bad faith and prompt Russia or China to adopt a similar stance on the sanctions against Iran and North Korea.

(Editing by Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Mildheadwound wrote:
Hey France, how would you like someone arming your increasing anarchist populace? How legal would that be? ‘Thought so.

Jun 29, 2011 8:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tupacalypse wrote:
Frances interpretation: “We can give anything we want to the rebels, even WMDs, because it’s “protecting” civilians.”

Jun 29, 2011 9:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
zelrik wrote:
People can say what they want but I like this a lot. France already recognized the rebels in Libya as legitimate organization, they are just putting their actions where their mouth is.

Jun 29, 2011 10:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.