Rhode Island Senate approves same-sex civil unions

PROVIDENCE Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:03pm EDT

Related Topics


Obama at the bar

Obama shares drinks and shoots pool during a stopover in Denver.  Slideshow 

PROVIDENCE (Reuters) - Rhode Island's Senate approved same-sex civil unions on Wednesday, passing a controversial bill not amended from the House version and sent on to the governor who is expected to sign the law.

On a vote of 21 to 16, the Senate approved the proposal sponsored by Democratic state Rep. Peter Petrarca that grants legal rights to same-sex partners "without the historical and religious meaning associated with the word marriage," a statement from the Rhode Island General Assembly said.

"I am very proud of my colleagues in the General Assembly for recognizing that this is the right piece of legislation at the right time," said Petrarca, who supports same-sex marriage.

"We have made great progress in our goal of providing increased rights, benefits and protections for gay and lesbian couples," he added. "This bill is a step forward to ensuring equality and improving their quality of life."

The bill has been sent to Governor Lincoln Chafee, an independent, Senate spokesman Greg Pare told Reuters. A Chafee spokesman said the governor is expected to sign the bill.

The decision for tiny Rhode Island comes a week after New York became the nation's most populous state to legalize gay marriage.

The proposal defines civil unions as a legal union between two individuals of the same sex, granting all the rights, benefits, protections and responsibilities to them that the state affords to people who are married.

Gay advocacy groups, such as Marriage Equality Rhode Island (MERI), support some aspects of the civil unions bill but would prefer same-sex nuptials to be legalized in the state.

Some groups had asked legislative leaders to seek removal of a House amendment they say would let any religious entity -- including hospitals, cemeteries, and schools -- and its employees effectively ignore the legal standing of a civil union for any reason it chooses.

For example, a civil union spouse could be denied the ability to participate in a partner's emergency medical care if the hospital had a religious affiliation and decided not to recognize civil union partners.

If the amendment is not removed by the senate, MERI will ask Governor Chafee to veto the bill, MERI executive director Gene Dyszlewski said.

Opposed to the bill altogether is the National Organization for Marriage's Rhode Island chapter. The group says same-sex civil unions threaten the concept of one man-one woman marriage and the bill doesn't protect the religious liberties of businesses and individuals.

Rhode Island and Maine have not joined their four New England neighbors - Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire and Connecticut -- in legalizing same-sex nuptials. Same sex marriage is also now legal in Iowa, the District of Columbia and, most recently, New York.

Civil unions were approved in Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois and New Jersey.

Same sex marriage is banned in 39 states.

(Reporting by Zach Howard; Editing by Barbara Goldberg and Jerry Norton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
SteveMD2 wrote:
NOM is on the SPLC hate group list. Not for religious beliefs, but for signs like those at their rallies that said “solution to gay marriage”

and showed two nooses

And while thinking about ARchbishop Dolan, these links come to mind


His former diocese of Milwaukee filed for bankruptcy due to the cost of lawsuits re the endless hidden molestaion of children.

this is link to Philadelphia grand jury report on catholic church abuse, hidden for decades

Some of the kids wsere beaten sensless by their parents for daring to tell the truth about priests. Such is the 1000 year finely tuned grip on the mind of their church. Some kids actually ended up in mental institutions thanks to the church and its crimes.s

Jun 30, 2011 1:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Zzardozz wrote:
The state should stop giving out marriage licenses and ONLY give out civil union licenses for straight and gay couples alike. Then they can go to whatever church they want to go to to be married. Just make the requirement to get married to be that couples need to have a civil union license. End of debate.

Jun 30, 2011 2:05am EDT  --  Report as abuse
daniwitz13 wrote:
This kind of law is like hiding behind a Woman’s skirt. It has to be called Same Gender Marriage or Same Gender Civil Unions, and NOT say or infer it is for Gays. This because, Gays cannot Prove in any way their Gayness. There are NO methods in existence to determine if a person is really Gay. An orientation could be of many different things of which sexual is one of them. But like a Democrat, vegetarian or a Baptist, It cannot be determined. By saying it is Same Gender it gets around this sticky point. Gays by themselves should have no ‘standing’ in Court because they cannot have proof of who they are. Everyone knows it is a Gay Marriage but cannot be called that. One has to wonder of the wording of one Man and one Man Marriage, if not, one Man could marry three other Men and be legal under this law. Pity.

Jun 30, 2011 2:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.