Astronaut selling the wrong stuff?

Related Topics

Astronaut Edgar Mitchell on the surface of the moon during the 1971 Apollo 14 mission. REUTERS/NASA

Astronaut Edgar Mitchell on the surface of the moon during the 1971 Apollo 14 mission.

Credit: Reuters/NASA

NEW YORK | Fri Jul 1, 2011 11:13am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The government has sued a former NASA astronaut to recover a camera used to explore the moon's surface during the 1971 Apollo 14 mission after seeing it slated for sale in a New York auction.

The lawsuit, filed in Miami federal court on Wednesday, accuses Edgar Mitchell of illegally possessing the camera and attempting to sell it for profit.

In March, NASA learned that the British auction house Bonhams was planning to sell the camera at an upcoming Space History Sale, according to the suit.

The item was labeled "Movie Camera from the Lunar Surface" and billed as one of two cameras from the Apollo 14's lunar module Antares. The lot description said the item came "directly from the collection" of pilot Edgar Mitchell and had a pre-sale estimate of $60,000 to $80,000, the suit said.

Mitchell was a lunar module pilot on Apollo 14, which launched its nine-day mission in 1971 under the command of Alan Shepard. The sixth person to walk on the moon, Mitchell is now retired and runs a website selling his autographed picture.

He has made headlines in the past for his stated belief in the existence of extraterrestrial life.

"All equipment and property used during NASA operations remains the property of NASA unless explicitly released or transferred to another party," the government suit said, adding NASA had no record of the camera being given to Mitchell.

The suit said the government had made repeated requests to Mitchell and his lawyer to return the camera but received no response.

Mitchell's lawyer, Donald Jacobson, said NASA management was aware of and approved Mitchell's ownership of the camera 40 years ago.

"Objects from the lunar trips to the moon were ultimately mounted and then presented to the astronauts as a gift after they had helped NASA on a mission," Jacobson said.

Bonhams said in an emailed statement that the camera had been slated to be auctioned off in May when it learned about the ownership dispute from NASA. The auction house withdrew the camera from sale "pending further discussion between NASA and the consignor," a Bonhams spokesperson said.

The government is asking the court to stop Mitchell from selling the camera to anyone, to order its return and to declare that the United States has "good, clean and exclusive title" to the camera.

(Reporting by Terry Baynes; Editing by Cynthia Johnston)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Stager wrote:
Which camera?
Was it the Swedish Hasselblad (with a German lens) or the Japanese Nikon? Both of those were used by NASA.

Funny how we could put a man on the moon but can’t produce a camera good enough to take on the trip.

Jul 01, 2011 1:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SekureAtty wrote:
I find it hard to believe that an astronaut that walked on the moon was able to hold on to a camera after a mission like that. Especially during the quarantine phase. It seems likely that it was given to him as a gift. They probably want it back to help with payroll issues.

Jul 03, 2011 4:29am EDT  --  Report as abuse
TechGuy101 wrote:
Stager, the article indicates that it is a movie camera, not a still camera which is what the Hasselblad and Nikon would be.

Jul 06, 2011 6:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.