Prosecutors detail flaws in Strauss-Kahn accuser's account

NEW YORK Fri Jul 1, 2011 2:54pm EDT

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. speaks to the media after a hearing in his case against former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn at the New York State Supreme Courthouse in New York July 1, 2011. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. speaks to the media after a hearing in his case against former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn at the New York State Supreme Courthouse in New York July 1, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The woman who accused former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn of sexual assault admitted she lied to a grand jury about what happened after the purported attack, prosecutors told Strauss-Kahn's lawyers in a letter.

The inconsistencies in her story led investigators to lose faith in her credibility as a witness, a dramatic turnabout in the case against a man who once had been seen as a top contender for the French presidency.

The accuser initially told prosecutors and the grand jury she fled to the hallway after the incident and waited for Strauss-Kahn to leave, and informed a supervisor of what happened shortly after, prosecutors said.

"The complainant (accuser) has since admitted that this account was false and that after the incident in Suite 2806, she proceeded to clean a nearby room and then returned to Suite 2806 and began to clean that suite before she reported the incident to her supervisor," the letter said.

(Reporting by Daniel Trotta; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
BrianX wrote:
and on that basis, the case is thrown out ?

Does it even come into play, the evidence of assault ?

Jul 01, 2011 1:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
toby3061 wrote:
Let this be a lesson to any of you peons who might want to go up against the ELITE!

Jul 01, 2011 1:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
dmarsh wrote:
It is very depressing that news bureaus and others (the prosecutor?) are putting the onus on the victim in these circumstances. The defendant’s pastis more inculpatory, more discrediting of credibility, than the victim’s. If the prosecutor drops the charges on what we have seen, it is obvious people have been bought.

Jul 01, 2011 2:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.