New defense chief sees tough budget choices
WASHINGTON |
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Leon Panetta was sworn in as defense secretary on Friday promising to keep the military strong while making tough choices on defense spending cuts.
Panetta, who as CIA director helped oversee the operation that killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden two months ago, arrives at the Pentagon at a moment of transition in the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and intense debate over the American role in Libya.
But the budget battle may be as big a challenge as the wars he will inherit.
President Barack Obama has called on the Defense Department to come up with $400 billion in reductions over 12 years as he struggles to reduce the country's $1.4 trillion deficit and $14 trillion debt.
Panetta, in a message to U.S. forces around the world, said that would "require us all to be disciplined in how we manage taxpayer resources."
"While tough budget choices will need to be made, I do not believe in the false choice between fiscal discipline and a strong national defense. We will all work together to achieve both," Panetta said.
The 73-year-old Panetta was greeted upon arrival at the Pentagon by Marine Lieutenant General John Kelly.
Kelly was the senior military assistant to outgoing Pentagon chief Robert Gates and will continue in the powerful position under Panetta, who must oversee a faster-than-expected drawdown from Afghanistan announced by Obama last month.
About a third of the U.S. forces in Afghanistan will be withdrawn by next summer, a faster timetable than U.S. military commanders had recommended.
"Welcome aboard, sir," Kelly said, shaking Panetta's hand as stepped out of his chauffeured vehicle.
IRAQ LOOMS
Panetta had a full first day in office, including attending a 1:30 p.m. (1730 GMT) meeting with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and service chiefs in "The Tank," the ultra-secure Pentagon briefing room.
In a long career that included positions as White House chief of staff and budget director, Panetta was also an Army intelligence officer in the 1960s -- a point he noted in his message to troops. He promised to keep the U.S. military the strongest in the world, despite the fiscal pressures.
Panetta also must oversee a total withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Iraq by the end of the year, even as rising violence raises questions about that country's future.
June was the deadliest month for U.S. forces in Iraq in three years, with 14 U.S. personnel killed.
Panetta told Congress last month he expected Iraq to eventually ask Washington to keep some U.S. troops in the country beyond the end-2011 deadline for their withdrawal.
He made no mention of that prediction on Friday, stressing only the need to cement a strategic relationship with the Iraqi government as "we continue our transition out of Iraq."
"It is in America's interests to help Iraq realize its potential to become a stable democracy in a vitally important region in the world," he said.
(Editing by Xavier Briand)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Since there are always noisy, and rich, voices wanting to use the USA as their personal mercenary force, steps need to be taken to reduce that temptation and to make it impossible to do offhand invasions of other countries. That means the US capability to act quickly must be removed. Administration after administration has been too quick to impoverish the American people for the benefit of a small cadre of the wealthy. We simply cannot trust them, no matter what they claim while campaigning.
We need a maximum head count for combat capable units, and it must be small. We must cut bases in the traditional areas of abuse completely. This means all basses from Italy to Australia. We must cut the number of Navy carriers and “other” multiple aircraft ships in half. We must require a national direct popular confirmation vote for foreign troop deployments after 6 months, on pain of halting all pay and benefits for the entire military establishment. No exceptions!
Not all of this would be necessary if the Government were responsive and if our “representative” system actually represented the public. But it is not and does not. First, we must take the sword from their hands.


Follow Reuters