Wealth and Investing Center

Banks cutting principal on some mortgages: report

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Sun Jul 3, 2011 5:54pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Bank of America Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co have started modifying tens of thousands of mortgages where the banks deem the loans especially risky, even if the borrowers have not asked, the New York Times reported on Sunday.

In some cases, the paper said, the banks are slashing the amount borrowers owe, citing one case in Florida where a woman's principal balance was cut in half.

The paper said the banks are targeting holders of pay option adjustable-rate mortgages, a type of loan where borrowers have the option of skipping some principal and interest payments and having the amount added back onto the loan.

Such "option ARM" loans were seen as especially high risk in the wake of the financial crisis; the two banks collectively still have tens of billions of dollars of such loans in their portfolios.

One law professor quoted by the Times said the banks were behaving in contradictory ways, modifying some loans that should not be and not modifying some loans that should be.

Spokespeople for the two banks were not immediately available to comment.

(Reporting by Ben Berkowitz. Editing by Maureen Bavdek)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
cebu4you wrote:
they should lower the principal. in 2006 i paid 466,000 for my home and as of 4 months ago it was apprised at 245,000 and will probably go down further before this housing mess is all over with, I say lower all principals by 50% and that will be fair. market to market, the way it should be done.

Jul 03, 2011 8:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
alldayUSA wrote:
So…using that logic…had your house appreciated in value to lets say $500,000 the bank could RAISE your principal amount?

2006 was when the housing STUPIDITY was in full swing. Buyers like YOU fueled that stupidity. The housing bubble could not have happened if there were no buyers willing to pay more than a place was worth. Folks like you did just that.

The bottom line is YOU made a VERY bad decision. Why should the investors and savers at the bank lose money, that is who really loses, because YOU made a stupid decision.

Sorry, live with your mistakes and quit blaming others or expecting someone else to be responsible for your actions.

Jul 03, 2011 12:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.