Any force deal with Iraq must address Iran: Mullen

WASHINGTON Thu Jul 7, 2011 4:14pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Iran is directly supporting extremist Shi'ite groups that are killing U.S. troops in Iraq and any agreement to keep American forces there beyond the end of the year would have to address the problem, the top U.S. military officer said on Thursday.

Admiral Mike Mullen, speaking at a luncheon with reporters, said Iranians -- with full knowledge of Iran's leadership -- were providing Iraqi Shi'ite groups with high-tech rocket-assisted weapons and shaped explosives effective at penetrating armor.

"Iran is very directly supporting extremist Shia groups which are killing our troops," said Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. "And there's no reason ... for me to believe that they're going to stop that as our numbers come down."

He said Iran made a conscious decision in 2008 to curb its involvement in Iraq, but had now resumed sending supplies to extremist groups, evidently positioning itself to be able to say that it had helped to drive U.S. forces from the region.

"There's no question they want to influence, and particularly in the south," Mullen said. "They are shipping high-tech weapons in there ... which are killing our people and ... the forensics prove that."

Mullen said he believed any agreement to keep U.S. troops in Iraq beyond the end of the year "has to be done in conjunction with control of Iran in that regard." He said Baghdad was aware of U.S. concerns about the issue.

All U.S. troops are scheduled to be out of Iraq by December 31 under a status of forces agreement between the two countries. But discussions are under way that could allow Iraqis to retain some U.S. forces to help in areas such as air defense where they need support.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said earlier this week that the Obama administration would consider any request made by the Iraqis to retain some U.S. troops there beyond the deadline.

He said no request had yet been made and indicated time was running out because Washington had to stay on course for withdrawal if it was to meet the December deadline for pulling out its remaining forces. Mullen said some 46,000 remain in Iraq.

Mullen said discussions were ongoing with the Iraqis about what capabilities were needed and how many personnel.

"The current discussions cover both, and there are very clear capability gaps that the Iraqi security forces are going to have," he said, citing air defense, aviation and elements of intelligence.

(Editing by Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
MissouriRick wrote:
Iran: We respectfully demand that you not stoke up any attacks against US troops who are in the middle of withdrawing from Iraq. You Iranians are obviously not in on the current US intentions: We are on our way OUT of Iraq and you are making it difficult. We hope you can see the far reaching implications of your prodding and provoking. We have taken pains in the last year to prevent deaths on both sides (the Iraqi’s and the US soldiers). You Iranians are interfering when we have begun a peaceful withdraw. We respectufully request you look into the recent history of our actions in the past year as we have kept the peace to a large extent and have been pulling out as we promised.

Jul 07, 2011 5:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Logical123 wrote:
Admiral Mullen just shoots his mouth off. He has absolutely no evidence against Iran. If he has evidence, why doesn’t he show it. Just presenting some missiles and claiming that they were made in Iran is not evidence.

There is a simple way for American soldiers not to be killed in Iraq. Just bring them home.

Jul 13, 2011 8:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus