Privately insured heart patients had best outcomes

CHICAGO Fri Jul 8, 2011 3:49pm EDT

Related Topics

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Patients who had heart valve replacement surgery who were privately insured had better medical outcomes than the uninsured and Medicaid patients undergoing the same procedure, researchers said on Friday.

As a result, the type of primary insurance should be considered an independent risk factor as patients and doctors weigh risks for surgery, they concluded.

The study, published in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons, found that uninsured and Medicaid status independently increased the risk of in-hospital mortality and the likelihood of complications after the surgery. This was true even after accounting for socioeconomic status, hospital-related and other factors associated with low-income patient groups, they said.

In addition, Medicaid patients accrued the longest average hospital stay and highest total costs.

"The study findings indicate that primary payer status should be considered as an independent risk factor during preoperative patient risk evaluation," said the study's lead author, Dr. Damien LaPar of the University of Virginia Health System.

From 2007 to 2008, the number of uninsured Americans rose by 600,000. Patients covered by Medicaid and Medicare, the U.S. government assistance insurance programs, increased by 4.4 million, while the number of Americans covered by private health insurance fell by 1 million.

Previous research has shown that Medicaid and uninsured patients have worse outcomes than privately insured patients after medical admissions.

While there have been studies on insurance status as a predictor of disease and the differences in allocation of surgical treatment as a function of the type of insurance a patient has, no study has fully examined the impact of the type of insurance on patients undergoing cardiac valve procedures, nor have they been evaluated in a national database, researchers noted.

The study examined 477,932 patients undergoing heart valve operations over a six-year period using discharge data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.

Patients in each payer group had different income and risk factors. After adjusting for risk factors, the type of insurance a patient had remained a highly significant predictor of mortality, they said.

(Reporting by Debra Sherman, editing by Matthew Lewis)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Joecynic wrote:
And they paid their Biggest Bucks for those top specialists. No?

Jul 08, 2011 4:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
klondikecat wrote:
Perhaps the quality AND skill of the Doctor played a part in the recovery?

Jul 10, 2011 2:11am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Univ01 wrote:
Quality and skill of the surgeon only play half the part, but the quality of nursing care is the biggest indicator of in-hospital mortality/complications post- cardiac surgery. My father had the best insurance money could buy, had the same cardiac surgeon who operated on President Bill Clinton and while his surgery was uncomplicated, he died 4 days after his surgery in one of the quote “best hospitals” in new york because the nursing/MD follow-up care was so poor, had they been accurately assessing him daily, he would still be here. Insurance or no insurance, go to a smaller hospital, with not only good cardiac surgeons, but a reputation for nursing excellence, a Magnet Hospital.

Jul 11, 2011 12:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.