Wealth and Investing Center

Dismal jobs picture complicates debt talks

1 of 5. Speaker of the House John Boehner listens to a question during a news conference about the jobs numbers in the Capitol in Washington July 8, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

WASHINGTON | Fri Jul 8, 2011 4:47pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Dismal unemployment figures on Friday complicated efforts to avert a looming U.S. debt default, and a top Republican said negotiators were not close to a deal that would ensure continued borrowing.

Tamping down expectations that Democrats and Republicans could reach agreement over the weekend, House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner said the two sides must overcome serious disagreements on taxes and spending cuts.

"It's not like there's some imminent deal about to happen," Boehner told a news conference. "This is a Rubik's Cube that we haven't quite worked out yet."

Partisan finger-pointing erupted anew after a government report showed the unemployment rate rose to 9.2 percent in June, dousing hopes that the economy is picking up steam.

Boehner, the top Republican in Congress, and President Barack Obama, a Democrat seeking reelection in 2012, are trying to craft a sweeping budget deal that would ensure the national debt remains at a sustainable level by cutting $4 trillion from budget deficits over 10 years.

That would give lawmakers political cover to raise the government's debt ceiling of $14.3 trillion before August 2, when the country is due to run out of borrowing capacity. Failure to act soon, some warn, could push the United States back into recession and send shock waves through the global economy.

Democrats and Republicans remain at odds over what elements should be part of the deal. Democrats are pushing for roughly $1 trillion in new tax revenue, while Republicans want to restructure popular benefit programs.

Negotiators might scale back a tax break for companies that provide health benefits to their workers, Representative Sander Levin, the top Democrat on the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, told Reuters. That would dwarf other revenue-generating elements on the table but could prompt more employers to stop offering health coverage.

The uncertainty in the debt-ceiling debate is hurting American companies and the overall economy, Obama said.

"The sooner we get this done, the sooner that the markets know that the debt limit ceiling will have been raised and that we have a serious plan to deal with our debt and deficit, the sooner that we give our businesses the certainty that they will need in order to make additional investments to grow and to hire," he said at the White House.

MEETING ON SUNDAY

For now, financial markets are showing little concern.

In fact, investors beat a path to the U.S. Treasury's sale of $28 billion in four-week bills on Wednesday, elbowing each other for the chance to buy debt paying zero interest and maturing on August 4 -- two days after the deadline.

Obama, Boehner and other congressional leaders are due to meet at the White House on Sunday at 6 p.m. EDT, with staffers working through the weekend to lay out options.

The session could see some hard bargaining but is not likely to produce a final deal, White House spokesman Jay Carney said.

The Republican-led House canceled a planned break during the week of July 18, which could make it easier for Congress to pass a deal by August.

Boehner faces a delicate balancing act. With dozens of conservative House Republicans expected to vote against any compromise, he will likely have to rely on Democratic votes to get a deal passed. That means some revenue increases may have to be part of the package, which could imperil Boehner's standing among conservative activists.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said she was optimistic a deal can be reached after meeting with Obama on Friday morning, but she insisted that the popular Social Security retirement program should not be part of the deal.

"We are not going to reduce the deficit or subsidize the tax cuts for the rich on the backs of America's seniors," Pelosi said.

Prospects probably were not helped by Friday's disappointing jobs report, which showed employers hired the fewest number of workers in nine months.

Obama is eager to bring the jobless rate down ahead of the November 2012 election, which will largely hinge on how Americans feel about the economy.

Republicans said his policies have made businesses reluctant to hire. A budget deal that includes tax hikes could make things worse, they said.

"It just does not make sense for Americans to suffer under higher taxes in an economy like this," said Representative Eric Cantor, the No. 2 House Republican.

Democrats fear the sharp spending cuts that Republicans want would further weaken the economy, and they are pushing for new tax cuts and spending measures to boost employment.

(Additional reporting by Thomas Ferraro, Caren Bohan, Laura MacInnis and Matt Spetalnick and David Morgan in Washington and Ellen Freilich in New York; Editing by John O'Callaghan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (60)
Sensibility wrote:
Who do these people think they’re kidding? It’s as if they expect us to believe that the debt limit and a $14 trillion deficit just snuck up on everyone. What were they doing six months ago? Why has it come to this? If the weak spined politicians (on both sides) were actually doing their jobs instead of playing politics and pandering to their bases, we would have a deficit reduction plan in the works right now, and would not still be politicking at the 11th hour. What a shame. Vote them all out in 2012. Obama, the House, and the Senate. Every one of them who’s up for re-election. Maybe then they’ll do their jobs.

Jul 07, 2011 9:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Sensibility wrote:
Or rather their replacements will do their jobs.

Jul 07, 2011 10:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ginchinchili wrote:
Sensibility: Whether you like Obama or not, he’s better than putting a Republican in the presidency. Whatever justifiable complaints you have about the Democrats, and there are plenty, one thing is true for them that can’t be said about the current state of the Republican Party. The Democrats are not extremists. The Republicans most certainly are.

What were they doing six months ago? The Republicans were high-fiving each other for their successful plan to take back the House by telling everyone that Obama isn’t really an American and that they will focus like a laser on job creation. I’m sure they were also discussing their next plan, to convince the country that we are months away from financial Armageddon and that they will save the day by refusing to raise the debt limit. Six months ago no one was worried about the debt (though they should have been worrying for the last 30 years) and now everyone is obsessed about it. In the meantime they were telling their corporate sponsors that they’ve got a great plan to lower their taxes and give them full control of the American government once and for all.

They pull the same chicanery with Iraq. Iraq was just an annoyance six months before we invaded, but by the time Bush, his Administration, and the rightwing propaganda machine got through with us the entire country was worried about Saddam, his WMDs, and were wanting revenge for Saddam’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks, which of course, was no involvement at all. Like my cousin said to me as he was showing me his deck of cards which contained the faces Saddam and this top generals and ministers, “Everyone knows Saddam was the one behind 9/11.” It was so evident that my cousin was so hopeless indoctrinated I didn’t even waste my time trying to convince him otherwise. Sure. Right. Everyone knows that.

What were the Democrats doing six months ago? Mostly standing around scratching their heads muttering, WTF?

Another reason we can’t afford to elect another Republican to the presidency is that the next president might have to nominate another Supreme Court Justice and until we make the conservative majority on the bench a minority, true election reform will be impossible. And until we reform our election process, particularly how we pay for it, having control of our government will be impossible.

Our very democracy depends on the makeup of the Supreme Court. Election reform will be hard enough if we are able to get a majority on the Supreme Court who believe in democracy and understand the spirit and intention our Founding Fathers had in mind when they crafted our democratically elected Republic. But it will literally be impossible with a Republican president and a majority of conservatives on the Supreme Court.

Jul 07, 2011 11:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.