Boehner says debt talks scaled back over tax rift

Related Topics

Speaker of the House John Boehner speaks about the jobs numbers during a news conference in the Capitol in Washington July 8, 2011. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Speaker of the House John Boehner speaks about the jobs numbers during a news conference in the Capitol in Washington July 8, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

WASHINGTON | Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:15am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A broad $4 trillion deal on U.S. deficit reduction appeared out of reach on Saturday as Republican leader John Boehner cited a rift with the White House on taxes and proposed pursuing a more modest package.

"Despite good-faith efforts to find common ground, the White House will not pursue a bigger debt-reduction agreement without tax hikes," Boehner, the speaker of the House of Representatives and the top Republican in Congress, said in a statement.

"I believe the best approach may be to focus on producing a smaller measure."

Boehner and President Barack Obama, who hoped to bolster his bid for re-election in 2012 with the achievement of a historic deficit-reduction package, spoke about the negotiations by phone on Saturday.

On the eve of a meeting between Obama, Boehner and other congressional leaders at the White House on Sunday, staff for both Republicans and Democrats have been working through the weekend.

Obama and Boehner had both set their sights on an ambitious $4 trillion plan, but Boehner's abandonment of the bigger goal means the negotiations will likely now focus on a package that would cut the deficit by more than $2 trillion over a decade.

An aide to Obama said the president would not back off in his efforts to solve U.S. debt problems and will make the case to congressional leaders in talks on Sunday for taking on "this critical challenge."

"We need a balanced approach that asks the very wealthiest and special interests to pay their fair share," White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said in a statement.

The White House needs to secure a deal on deficit reduction to clear the way for an increase in the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling before a deadline of August 2, when the Treasury has warned the United States faces risk of a default. The White House and private economists say a default could push the United States back into recession and trigger global financial chaos.

BALKING AT TAX INCREASES

Democrats want to shield popular domestic programs from huge cuts and say that any deal must include increases in tax revenue. Many Republicans have said they would not support a package that includes any tax increases.

A $4 trillion deficit reduction plan would have involved reining in spending on the Social Security retirement program and Medicare, the government-run healthcare program for the elderly. Many in Obama's Democratic Party oppose such cuts.

Aides to Obama and Boehner were discussing revenue increases that would have been achieved in part by a streamlining of the tax code. Democrats were seeking $1 trillion in additional revenue, an increase that many rank-and-file Republicans appeared loath to support.

One Republican familiar with the deficit talks said taxes and cuts in benefit programs were both sticking points.

"The White House would not agree with the core elements of tax reform proposed by the speaker," the Republican source said. "A gulf also remains between the speaker and the White House on the issue of medium- and long-term structural reforms."

Leana Fallon, an aide to House Republican Leader Eric Cantor, said the tax increases Democrats wanted "cannot pass the House" and urged that the talks focus on a framework for between $2 and $2.5 trillion in cuts discussed in meetings led by Vice President Joseph Biden during May and June.

Democratic Representative Chris Van Hollen blamed the abandonment of a bigger deficit-reduction goal on a "Republican fixation with protecting tax breaks for corporate special interests and the very wealthy."

The Biden talks had identified savings of between $1.9 trillion and $2.7 billion. Republicans want an agreement for at least $2 trillion in cuts as the price for a debt limit increase that would be big enough to accommodate the nation's borrowing needs through the 2012 election.

But even with a scaled-back goal, it might still be difficult to resolve the differences over taxes. At a minimum, Democrats want to close enough tax loopholes to bring in $400 billion in new revenue.

Republicans want any elimination of tax breaks to be offset by cuts elsewhere.

(Additional reporting by Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (35)
ginchinchili wrote:
I’m about ready to say let the ignorant radical right have their way. Default. And for the first time in our history the full faith and credit our country won’t mean squat. They ruined our credibility in foreign policy with a bogus, unnecessary, very expensive invasion and occupation of Iraq and now they want to ruin our economic credibility. They are just too stupid and too powerful, and it’s only going to get worse.

So the Republicans will succeed in handing the reins of world leadership to China. This is going to hurt. And as I said, it will get worse. They will continue to use propaganda to get the gullible rightwingers to do increasingly bad things. The worse off our country gets, the more extreme the rightwing will get and the more sever and threatening their propaganda will get. Just wait and see what happens after the next terrorist attack or the next time we get a serious threat from a foreign country. When millions of Americans are out of work and can’t provide for their families, that’s when people will get desperate and will be easy fodder for propaganda promising food and security. When we reach that point it will be too late. And when that happens it will happen quickly.

It would be hard to stop now, but now is the time to do it if we’re ever going to because it will get worse and there will be a point of no return. We can either fight back or participate in the fall of one of the greatest societies in the history of the world. But the right clearly does not have America’s best interests at heart. They have become our enemy from within, and they know we can’t stop their propaganda machine because it’s protected by the free speech that is guaranteed to us by the Constitution. We’re in a hell of a mess.

Jul 09, 2011 8:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ClayManBob wrote:
Mr. Boehner, “NO YOU CAN’T!”

Jul 09, 2011 8:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
XRayD wrote:
I think Boehner has got the message. Obama was almost certainly going to go “big” with changes to Social Security and Medicare – against the wishes of his own party. Such a deal would have killed the Ryan approach to fixing Medicare. At the same time, most Democrats who are against changes to social security, would have voted against Obama’s “compromise” – while the Republican majority in the house would have had to vote FOR any deal Boehner made with Obama.

It is obvious what would happen to most those in congress who would have voted to cut social security, in the 2012 election!

Hasta la vista, baby!

Barring any resurgence in Republican fortunes, this would mean full Democratic control in Washington after 2012, with even Libermann gone!

Jul 09, 2011 9:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.