FDA proposes targeted drug testing guidelines

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Tue Jul 12, 2011 4:30pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Targeted drugs or therapies up for regulatory approval would have to be reviewed simultaneously with the diagnostic devices they rely on, according to a proposed policy issued on Tuesday.

So-called targeted treatments or personalized medicines are tailored to a person's genetic makeup and are being increasingly developed by drug companies.

The Food and Drug Administration proposed rules saying these personalized treatments would gain approval only after their accompanying diagnostic devices also receive approval -- unless the treatment is for a serious or life-threatening condition.

Diagnostic tests, known as companion diagnostics, improve the effectiveness of targeted treatments by determining if a patient is a genetic fit with a therapy. They can help doctors identify which patients are most likely to benefit from a new drug, or experience debilitating side effects, and help save enormous cost by eliminating people who would not be helped.

Pfizer's experimental drug crizotinib, for example, is designed to target a specific genetic mutation prevalent in nonsmokers with non-small cell lung cancer. Crizotinib, which is being reviewed on a priority basis by U.S. regulators, has a companion test developed by Abbott Laboratories, which partnered with Pfizer about two years ago.

The FDA's proposed rules outlined only two exceptions when a new targeted drug or therapy could receive approval without FDA also approving its companion diagnostic.

One is for new treatments of serious or life-threatening conditions that have no other satisfactory treatments and only if the new treatment shows "pronounced" benefits that outweigh the risks. The second is for labeling changes to already-approved therapies to address safety concerns.

The FDA is now seeking public comment on the proposal.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
gpawelski wrote:
The headlong rush to develop companion diagnostics to identify molecular predisposing mechanisms does not guarantee that a cancer drug will be effective for an ‘individual’ patient. Nor can they, for any patient or even large group of patients, discriminate the potential for clinical activity among different cancer agents of the same class.

The drug discovery model over the last number of years has been limited to one gene/protein, one target, one drug. The ‘cell’ is a system, an integrated, interacting network of genes, proteins and other cellular constituents that produce functions. You need to analyse the systems’ response to drug treatments, not just one target or pathway.

Uncovering the genetic differences that determine how a person responds to a drug, and developing tests, or biomarkers, for those differences, is proving more challenging than ever. As a result, patients with cancer are still being prescribed medicines on a trial-and-error basis or one-size-fits-all.

The key to understanding the genome is understanding how cells work. The ultimate driver is ‘functional’ pre-testing (is the cell being killed regardless of the mechanism) as opposed to ‘target’ pre-testing (does the cell express a particular target that the drug is supposed to be attacking). While a ‘target’ test tells you whether or not to give ‘one’ drug, a ‘functional’ pre-test can find other compounds and combinations and can recommend them from the one test.

Jul 13, 2011 5:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.