Vast wind energy proposal could kill endangered birds

SALMON, Idaho Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:13pm EDT

A whooping crane stands in an enclosure at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center in Laurel, Maryland, in this photo taken October 10, 2010 and released to Reuters on February 8, 2011. REUTERS/LDWF (Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries)/Carrie Salyers/Handout

A whooping crane stands in an enclosure at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center in Laurel, Maryland, in this photo taken October 10, 2010 and released to Reuters on February 8, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/LDWF (Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries)/Carrie Salyers/Handout

Related Topics

SALMON, Idaho (Reuters) - The Obama administration is evaluating a plan to allow a 200-mile corridor for wind energy development from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico that would allow for killing endangered whooping cranes.

The government's environmental review will consider a permit sought by 19 energy developers that would permit turbines and transmission lines on non-federal lands in nine states from Montana to the Texas coast, overlapping with the migratory route of the cranes.

The permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service would allow the projects to "take" an unspecified number of endangered species. Under the Endangered Species Act, "take" is defined as killing or injuring an endangered species

The government can issue permits to kill or injure listed species with no penalties or risks of lawsuits to developers who agree to craft conservation plans.

According to federal officials, the large scale of the review will help streamline the permitting process by lumping many projects into a single study.

The Obama Administration has been working to speed development of renewable energy projects by improving coordination among various state and federal agencies.

Environmentalists, however, say the "fast track" process results in inadequate environmental reviews.

The Administration's latest wind energy proposal raises concerns among wildlife advocates because the developments would overlap with habitat imperiled birds such as whooping cranes rely on, including the Central Flyway, a migratory path that cuts through North America's midsection between the Arctic and the Tropics.

The leading cause of death for the nation's last historic population of whooping cranes, which stand at 5 feet and have a wingspan of more than 7 feet, is overhead utility lines, the Fish and Wildlife Service said.

Conservationists say the Central Flyway's population of 280 cranes -- which make a refueling stop along Platte River in Nebraska along with tens of thousands of sandhill cranes and snow geese -- would suffer with the loss of just a single adult breeding bird.


"I can hardly imagine what the government is thinking. Whooping cranes are the rarest of all the cranes, the rarest of American birds," said Paul Johnsgard, author of several books on the cranes and professor emeritus of ornithology at the University of Nebraska.

Fish & Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe said wind energy is crucial to the nation's future economic and environmental security, which is why the agency is paving the way for a renewable energy project with an undetermined number of wind turbines generating an unidentified amount of electricity along the 200-mile-wide corridor.

"We will do our part to facilitate development of wind energy resources, while ensuring that they are sited and designed in ways that minimize and avoid negative impacts to fish and wildlife," he said in a statement.

Whooping cranes, North America's tallest bird, once numbered in the tens of thousands before hunting and habitat loss caused their populations to plummet to 16 in the 1930s.

The cranes, which annually migrate thousands of miles from wintering grounds in coastal Texas to breeding and nesting areas in Alberta, Canada, were at the forefront of an emerging wildlife conservation movement in the 1960s that gave rise to a series of landmark laws aimed at preventing extinctions of rare and declining animals.

Whooping cranes were among the first creatures added to an early version of the Endangered Species Act in 1967.

Few other populations of whooping cranes exist in the United States, with an introduced flock in central Florida that does not migrate and a fledging group in Wisconsin that biologists have trained to fly to the winter refuge of Florida by following ultralight aircraft.

Attempts to establish crane populations elsewhere, including Idaho and Colorado, have failed.

Government scientists have not yet determined how many whooping cranes, other threatened and endangered birds and imperiled bats would be killed or otherwise harmed because of the wind project, said Amelia Orton-Palmer, conservation planner with the service.

"It's so early in the process we won't begin to speculate on what that might be," she said.

(Editing by Nichola Groom and Jerry Norton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (5)
Thinkpower wrote:
‘Environmentalists, however, say the “fast track” process results in inadequate environmental reviews.’

What’s the basis for this statement? There’s a quote from an ornithologist but no comment from major enviro organizations or well known “environmentalists”.

Jul 14, 2011 8:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Anders27 wrote:
Ms. Zuckerman,

First, I’m very disappointed by the introductory sentence you chose for this article – not only does it vividly display your slant, but it suggests that the industry and the administration INTENDS to kill off migratory birds in the process of implementation.

The issue of migratory birds is well on the minds of offshore wind energy developers and policy makers, as illustrated by, for example, the 2010 DOE NREL report, “Large-Scale Offshore Wind Power in the United States.”

Further, research suggests that this won’t be the massive slaughter you allude to in the article. Denmark conducted a study of migratory bird flying patterns using radar, and noted that the birds often changed their path after construction, (“35% of the birds flew through the area before construction, but only 9% flew through following the construction (pg. 188)).”

I’m not suggesting that this is the answer to a considerable concern, but it certainly indicates that the issue is firmly in the minds of decision makers and industry alike, and that research suggests impact will not be close to as severe as you suggest.

Lastly, are we really going to let the argument of potential impact to birds (your interviewee Orton-Palmer herself stated that it’s too early to tell) stand in the way of making serious headway toward a reduced dependence on coal-fired power plants? What is the long-term impact of coal usage on migratory birds, one might wonder.

Jul 15, 2011 10:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
MoreInsanity wrote:
Thank-you Anders27, for your voice of reason. Don’t we all find shoddy journalism tiring?

When are these “news” corps going to raise the bar and allow their writers time for unbiased, ethical, thoughtful reporting considerate of all the facts, and presented with depth.

Jul 17, 2011 12:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


California's historic drought

With reservoirs at record lows, California is in the midst of the worst drought in decades.  Slideshow