House Republicans give Dodd-Frank failing grade

Related Topics

Co-sponsors of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Sen. Christopher Dodd (L) and Rep. Barney Frank, wait for President Barack Obama to sign it into law at the Ronald Reagan Building in Washington, July 21, 2010. REUTERS/Larry Downing

Co-sponsors of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Sen. Christopher Dodd (L) and Rep. Barney Frank, wait for President Barack Obama to sign it into law at the Ronald Reagan Building in Washington, July 21, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

WASHINGTON | Fri Jul 15, 2011 1:08pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A group of congressional Republicans harshly criticized the Wall Street overhaul law on Friday and gave what they termed a failing report card to the year-old legislation.

The legislative debate on the Dodd-Frank financial oversight law was a heated partisan process as the Obama administration proposed stricter regulations for banks, hedge funds, derivatives traders and other financial market players.

Nearly one year after its enactment, Dodd-Frank remains an easy target for Republicans.

"Dodd-Frank burdens the private sector," Representative Spencer Bachus, the Alabama Republican who heads the Financial Services Committee, said in a news conference. "The vast majority of these rules have created an atmosphere of uncertainty in which innovators, job creators, and lenders can't put their ideas and capital to work."

Using a visual aid of an oversized report card and large red pen, the group of lawmakers from the House committee emblazoned failing grades to Dodd-Frank's legislative goals.

They said it was an expansion of government authority that resulted in increased unemployment and continued weakness in the housing market.

"What a difference a year makes, huh? Setting the United States on the collision course for economic mediocrity and a prolonged period of high unemployment," said Representative Scott Garrett, a New Jersey Republican.

The Obama administration has defended Dodd-Frank, saying the United States needed to fix a financial system that failed horribly, leading to catastrophic results for individuals, small businesses and the financial services sector fighting reforms.

Most of the reforms are not yet in place because regulators are behind schedule in writing hundreds of new rules.

The group of Republican lawmakers argued on Friday the nearly 400 federal rules mandated by Dodd-Frank will cost nearly $1.25 billion to carry out.

They also said the law was unable to end the perception that some banks are "too big to fail" and would be bailed out by the government if they become insolvent.

"The backstop of the federal government still exists for these large institutions," said Rep. Shelley Moore Capito, a West Virginia Republican. "What we've got here is a situation where the taxpayers are still on the hook."

House Republicans have spent the past year trying to repeal or scale back numerous Dodd-Frank measures. They have so far largely failed in the face of a Democrat-controlled Senate and President Barack Obama's veto pen.

(Reporting by Margaret Chadbourn; Editing by Padraic Cassidy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
USAPragmatist wrote:
Of Course they gave it a failing grade, because it is designed to prevent another financial crisis and protect the average person. By doing this it restricts the speculation that banks can do and sets up a consumer protection agency that will not allow them to rape the average consumer. This make it harder for them to make lots of profit and the GOP is all about protecting these big corporations so they can make loads of $$$ of the rest of us.

I and others, on the other hand, consider this the right and smart thing to do for the overall health of our economy and society.

Jul 15, 2011 2:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
NobleKin wrote:
“Dodd-Frank burdens the private sector,”

By that he means it is preventing huge banks and Wall Street institutions (he said innovators) from creating unsafe investment vehicles that would net them countless dollars in income.

We saw how the complex and ‘innovative’ derivative and default swaps served our interests…

Yet again, another fine example of Republicans putting their interest in serving their corporate masters before their service to the American people.

Jul 15, 2011 2:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
TheNewWorld wrote:
“Too big to fail” should have automatically meant, “must be broken up”. Time to start making the super banks back into small regional banks. With the internet and ATMs there is no need to have super banks that spans that whole US. So why do we continue to allow this risk to the US economy?

Jul 15, 2011 2:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.